body {background-color: #D2D1D5;}
Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news regarding law and policy changes that impact science and scientists today.
The Trump administration has finalized a plan to roll back regulations outlined by one of the nation’s bedrock environmental laws.
Signed into law in 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to assess how proposed major projects—such as the purchase of parklands, the establishment of military complexes, or the construction of buildings and highways—will impact the environment.
NEPA opponents, which include both Republicans and Democrats, claim the processes outlined in the legislation unnecessarily delay approvals for infrastructure and energy projects. Last February, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published an interim final rule removing NEPA regulations. The new action adopts the rule as final.
Related
• From the White House: CEQ Fixes Decades-Long Permitting Failure Through Deregulation
• Removal of National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations
• Letter from Environmental Organizations During Public Comment Period
• Trump administration finalizes plan to roll back federal environmental guidelines under bedrock law
• White House claims to end NEPA’s ‘regulatory reign of terror’
“In this Administration, NEPA’s regulatory reign of terror has ended,” said CEQ Chairman Katherine Scarlett in a statement. “Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, CEQ acted early to slash needless layering of bureaucratic burden and restore common sense to the environmental review and permitting process.”
In response to the interim final rule, the CEQ received more than 108,000 public comments, according to a document outlining the rule published today on the Federal Register. One such comment came from a coalition of environmental groups, expressing strong opposition to the rule last March.
NEPA “promotes sound and environmentally-informed decisionmaking by federal agencies, and it provides the primary way for the public to learn about and provide input regarding the impacts of federal actions on their lives,” the letter read. “The only certainty provided by the Interim Final Rule is less government transparency, more project delay, more litigation, less resilient infrastructure, and poor environmental and health outcomes for communities.”
—Emily Gardner (@emfurd.bsky.social), Associate Editor
These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about how changes in law or policy are affecting scientists or research? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org.
Text © 2026. AGU.
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.
