Feed aggregator

Ionosphere-weighted precise point positioning vs. dual-frequency carrier-to-code leveling for global vertical total electron content mapping

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Juncai Dong, Ahao Wang, Zhining Yang, Xuexi Liu, Zizhao Wang, Yitian Wen

Solar-cycle climatology of GNSS-ROTI ionospheric irregularities over China and their responses to solar and geomagnetic forcing (2011–2023)

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Yumei Fang, Wujiao Dai, Biyan Chen, Lin Pan, Ning Liu

A case of simultaneous daytime E-region and F-region irregularities at equatorial ionization anomaly crest during geomagnetic quiet period and the possible origin: coordinated observations of ground-based and satellite-based multi-instruments

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Yi Liu, Ting Lan, Xiang Wang, Zhongxin Deng, Mengyan Zhu, Yunzhou Zhu, Shuji Sun, Tong Xu, Cheng Wang, Longchang Sun, Yewen Wu, Yuqiang Zhang, Chen Zhou, Chunhua Jiang, Guobin Yang, Liguo Zhang, Jing Chen, Cheng Zeng

TCN-BiLSTM-MHATT: A hybrid deep learning model for global ionospheric TEC forecasting

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Hongliang Sun, Jun Tang, Mingfei Ding, Liang Zhang, Chaoqian Xu

Solar hemispheric asymmetry and geomagnetic response: periodicity analysis throughout the solar cycles 21–24

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): A.M. El-Taher, B.M. Habashy, M.A. El-Borie, A.A. Bishara, S.F. Ibrahim

Short-term ionospheric modeling over the Indian region using long short-term memory networks

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Parinda Prajapati, Amrita Sharma, Nimisha Patel

MSRU-Transformer: A Multi-Scale Receptive-Field Model with Skip Connections for Global Ionospheric TEC Prediction

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Wenhao Zhou, Dongsheng Zhao, Kefei Zhang, Craig M. Hancock

Disentanglement of seismo-ionospheric precursors from solar-induced factors: a dual-input transformer framework for the 2023 Türkiye earthquake

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Veysel Gider

Time–frequency characterization of prompt penetration electric fields across distinct geomagnetic regimes

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Shreeyan Rijal, Priyanshu Chaudhary, Shristi Sharma, Merry Thapa Thada Magar, Binod Regmi, Binod Adhikari

Qualitative behavior of nonlinear and supernonlinear waves in the Earth’s magnetosheath

Publication date: 1 September 2026

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 78, Issue 5

Author(s): Sweta Tiwari, Punam Kumari Prasad, Yogen Ghatani, Asit Saha

Real-time multi-station microseismic event detection via transfer learning of computer vision deep learning model

Geophysical Journal International - Wed, 09/02/2026 - 00:00
SummaryWith the shale gas exploration and development into deep strata (> 3500 m in depth), weak signal detection becomes more challenging and vital in surface-based microseismic monitoring. Most existing deep learning approaches are trained on synthetic or single-station data, which limits their performance in detecting weak events in field seismic recordings. Here, we propose a deep learning approach based on the computer vision object detection model YOLOv5 via transfer learning and train it on a dataset from field observation to better detect microseismic events in multi-channel seismic data. First, we convert continuous seismic data into waveform images in grayscale with a record length of 20 s, and manually annotate the microseismic events containing the first arrival signals using rectangular boxes. To train the model, the transfer learning strategy is used by using parameters of YOLOs in computer vision to initiate the model. After training and validation, we conducted comprehensive tests to examine the performance of the model. Compared with the single-station short-term average/long-term average (STA/LTA) detector, our method reduces false positives markedly, yet it also delivers higher recall rate than the available multi-station detection scheme. When applied to continuous dataset from a different area, the model achieved good performance with a precision of 0.9832 and a recall of 0.9702, indicating it learns representative features of microseismic signals. All these tests illustrate that the proposed method achieves high detection accuracy, low false positive rates, and robustness. Meanwhile, the method possesses the superiority for real-time monitoring and can be easily updated by adding a few new samples to the training dataset.

Salt of the Earth: How Egypt's coastal sabkhas tell a story of climate and change

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 22:00
Have you ever walked across a salt flat so expansive it feels like another planet? That's what it's like standing in Egypt's coastal sabkhas—those otherworldly landscapes where the ground crunches beneath your feet and the air shimmers with heat. These aren't just barren wastelands; they're living laboratories that record the pulse of our changing climate.

Canada's Labrador Shelf preserves climate records once thought erased by ice

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 21:40
The Labrador Shelf is a shallow marine area on the margin of the Labrador Sea in the North Atlantic off the east coast of Canada. During the last ice age, this region was covered by the Laurentide Ice Sheet, one of the largest ice masses in Earth's history, which once covered vast parts of North America.

Next-gen sensors: Catching water pollution in real time

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 17:20
Extreme weather events, such as floods, droughts and torrential rains, affect water quality in lakes, rivers and coastal areas. This creates significant challenges for ecosystems and water supplies because pesticides bound in soil can quickly leach into water sources. Now, researchers want to monitor this in a new way.

Geomagnetic superstorm shook GPS accuracy across the US—its timing may have averted agricultural losses

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 16:30
On Nov. 11, 2025, Earth experienced a severe geomagnetic storm triggered by solar flares and coronal mass ejections from an active sunspot region. While this kind of storm brings beautiful auroras admired in many areas around the world, it can also cause ionospheric disturbances that disrupt radio waves and affect crucial technologies. A new study, published in Geophysical Research Letters, found that disruptions caused by this storm scrambled GPS signals in areas where such disruptions have never been reported.

Los Angeles Basin map shows deep sediments that could amplify earthquake shaking

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 13:40
In computer simulations of the Big One—a large-magnitude earthquake that may occur along the San Andreas Fault in California—seismic waves ripple from the epicenter of a magnitude 7.8 earthquake near the Salton Sea into the Los Angeles Basin.

Individual Consequences of a Global Crisis

EOS - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 12:40
Climate & Personal Health

The health effects of our warming climate go far beyond heat illnesses and direct fallouts from more frequent natural disasters. This issue of Eos explores some of the more nuanced ways that climate change is influencing personal health outcomes.

As deputy editor Emily Gardner bluntly states in the headline of this month’s new feature, “Antimicrobial Resistance Is Killing Millions. Climate Change Is Making It Worse.” Although climate change is far from the only (or even the leading) cause of antimicrobial resistance, it is a factor: “Climate change can modify the environmental, ecological, and social conditions that allow resistant microorganisms and resistance genes to emerge, persist, move, and reach humans, animals, and ecosystems,” environmental health scientist Ronan Adler Tavella explains.

There are many other correlations between specific effects of climate change and personal health. Some scientists have linked an increase in particulate air pollution driven by more intense, more frequent wildfires to greater instances of stroke. Others have found that sea surface temperatures may help predict seasonal risks of malaria thousands of kilometers away.

Researchers have long tracked the mental toll of climate change but are now drawing specific lessons from specific instances. Scientist-authors Maheshwari Neelam and Kamaldeep Bhui, for example, explain how lake bed dust from the drying Great Salt Lake is associated with mental health outcomes across Utah in “Lessons from Linking Great Salt Lake Desiccation and Depression.” Scientists are only beginning to learn the lessons of extreme temperatures and fatal overdoses, explains science reporter Grace van Deelen in “Extreme Heat and Extreme Cold Drive an Increase in Fatal Overdoses.”

Finally, effectively communicating the relationships between climate change and personal health is a science unto itself. That’s one message from research in GeoHealth that Rebecca Owen covers in “Many Americans Underestimate Health Risks of Extreme Weather, New Study Finds.” Poor risk communication can leave affected populations underprepared to face health dangers that can accompany climate-driven ecological changes, extreme heat and cold, and more intense instances of natural hazards.

We hope this issue of Eos helps improve risk communication by allowing you to better appreciate the scope and influence of climate change.

—Caryl-Sue Micalizio, Editor in Chief

Citation: Micalizio, C.-S. (2026), Individual consequences of a global crisis, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260279. Published on 1 September 2026. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Kaikōura erosion monitoring holds answers for world's rock coastlines

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 12:40
Erosion rates on parts of the Kaikōura Peninsula more than doubled after the 2016 earthquake, showing major quakes can "rapidly alter" the way coastlines evolve, an Otago researcher says.

Antimicrobial Resistance Is Killing Millions. Climate Change Is Making It Worse.

EOS - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 12:39
Climate & Personal Health

Born with cystic fibrosis, Ella Balasa is used to doing several breathing treatments a day and taking antibiotics to fight the infections in her lungs. By her mid-twenties, the antibiotic courses were taking longer and longer to work. In 2019, she got severely sick. Despite a combination of oral and intravenous antibiotics, her lungs would fill up with mucus every few hours. Her lung function dipped down to the teens. (Normal function is 80% or higher.)

“I’m not going to live to be able to fight off these infections,” she remembers thinking. “Antibiotics aren’t working, and that’s all we have, so I don’t know what I’m going to do.”

In her mid-twenties, Ella Balasa faced a serious lung infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacterium that left her struggling to breathe. Credit: Laventie Benoit-Joseph/Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

“Antimicrobial use remains one of the central drivers of AMR, but climate change can modify the environmental, ecological, and social conditions that allow resistant microorganisms and resistance genes to emerge, persist, move, and reach humans, animals, and ecosystems.”

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), one in six infections is drug resistant. In some areas, it’s one in three. In 2021, WHO estimated that bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was associated with more than 4.7 million deaths around the world.

There are many factors driving the rise of AMR, including the misuse and overprescription of antibiotics not just for humans, but for controlling disease among livestock and agricultural crops. But a growing body of research suggests there’s another piece of the puzzle: a changing climate.

“Antimicrobial use remains one of the central drivers of AMR, but climate change can modify the environmental, ecological, and social conditions that allow resistant microorganisms and resistance genes to emerge, persist, move, and reach humans, animals, and ecosystems,” Ronan Adler Tavella, an environmental health scientist at the Antimicrobial Resistance Institute at the Federal University of São Paulo, told Eos in an email.

How Do Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes Spread?

Antimicrobial-resistant genes (ARGs) are found in nature because different microbial groups are often locked in ecological competition. In the soil, water, and even air, microbes produce antimicrobial compounds and resistance mechanisms designed to take out or communicate with competitor microbes. Bacteria are also capable of a unique phenomenon called horizontal gene transfer, meaning that bacteria can transfer genes between each other outside of a parent-offspring relationship, even across species.

Soil microbes, seen here under a microscope, naturally produce antibiotic genes as a form of offense against other microbes—and antibiotic-resistant genes as a form of defense. Credit: Courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory/Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

The field of medicine was transformed when physicians and researchers began taking advantage of ARGs to treat disease in the early 20th century. The broad class of antimicrobial drugs is designed to kill, inactivate, or slow the growth of microbes, which can include bacteria as well as viruses, parasites, and fungi.

“Antibiotics themselves are the pillar of basic and modern medicine.”

Antimicrobials are used to treat animal bites, pneumonia, strep throat, urinary tract infections, Lyme disease, cardiac infections, diarrhea, sexually transmitted diseases, ringworm, malaria, yeast infections, valley fever, eye and ear infections, parasitic infections, and many, many other ailments. In fact, experts say there’s not much we can do without them.

“Antibiotics themselves are the pillar of basic and modern medicine,” said Sarah Paulin-Deschenaux, a microbiologist and technical officer on antimicrobial resistance in WHO’s AMR department. “We need to have effective antibiotics to enable the treatment of simple cuts, the allowance of surgical procedures, [and] safe delivery for cancer chemotherapy.”

But there’s a catch.

An antimicrobial designed to kill a specific microbe—say, E. coli—doesn’t kill every single microbe. It kills many of them, but the most resistant ones survive. These microbes with ARGs can reproduce, creating a whole new community of microbes that don’t respond to the antimicrobial, creating the need for another.

However, overuse of antibiotics isn’t the only thing that can lead harmful microbes to grow stronger and spread. Everything from heavy metals to fertilizers to pharmaceutical waste in soil can cause stress to soil microbes.

“Anything that stresses them—heat, chemicals—all this is going to increase their mutation rates,” said Jason Burnham, an infectious disease and medicine professor at Washington University and VA St. Louis.

Fighting Infection in a Climate Hot Spot

Because Balasa, the cystic fibrosis patient, had to take antibiotics so often, the microbes in her body, which tend to proliferate in the scar tissue of her lungs, grew resistant over time.

But some antibiotic-resistant infections come seemingly without warning. Shortly after finishing her master’s degree in Mumbai, India, Bhakti Chavan was diagnosed with drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), though she had no previous history of the disease.

For 8 months, Chavan received antibiotic injections six times a week. Her course of oral antibiotics, a combination of four to five drugs taken daily, went on for another 16 months. Her side effects included depression, a darkened skin tone, and heavy nausea. She was unable to work for about 2 years. She stopped seeing friends and even stopped looking in the mirror.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the bacterium that causes tuberculosis. Shortly after college graduation, Bhakti Chavan was diagnosed with a drug-resistant form of tuberculosis, despite having no history of the disease. Credit: Ajay Kumar Chaurasiya/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

India is a hot spot for both high heat and AMR, which can be a deadly combination. As of 2021, an estimated 31% of India’s population over the age of 15 had a tuberculosis infection. It’s a situation Chavan is all too aware of.

When Bhakti Chavan was diagnosed with an antibiotic-resistant strain of tuberculosis, she had to take specialized antibiotics for two years. Her symptoms included depression, nausea, weight loss, and a darkened skin tone. Credit: Bhakti Chavan

Humans are struggling in the face of climate change, but microbes “are growing faster, they are becoming stronger, and they are becoming resistant,” Chavan said. “We need to seriously look into climate change right now. Because we need to be one step ahead of them.”

Strength in Adaptability

The climate has changed rapidly in the decades since the Industrial Revolution, leaving many individuals, communities, and nations struggling to adapt. In contrast, adaptability may just be bacteria’s greatest strength, Burnham explained.

For “some bacteria, their doubling time, or their ability to make a copy of themselves, is like 20 minutes. So, they can change really quickly to anything in their environment, whether that’s heat or pollutants or antibiotics,” Burnham said. “Obviously, we humans can’t do that as fast.”

Higher temperatures are making it easier for mosquitoes carrying diseases like malaria, seen here under a microscope, to thrive. Credit: Hanna Sörensson/Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0

Burnham used the example of the sickle cell anemia gene. Over time, the gene variant developed in people who live in tropical, mosquito-friendly areas where malaria is endemic because having a copy of the gene provides a strong resistance to malaria.

There were “similar conditions for so long that humans actually were able to adapt,” Burnham said. “Now things are changing so fast that they can’t” evolve quickly enough.

Higher temperatures are linked to increased risk of tuberculosis, COVID-19, and a wide array of other infectious diseases.

“Almost every type of bacterial infection categorization that we have, those are increased in warmer, more humid times of the year,” Burnham said. “So, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, skin infections, pneumonias, bloodstream infections. All of these things are more common when it’s warm.”

All of this represents an indirect, but real, link between climate change and AMR: When it’s hotter, more people are sick. And when more people are sick, more people are taking antibiotics.

Paulin-Deschenaux of WHO was careful to state that climate change is not the cause of AMR but noted that evidence linking the two is growing.

There is some evidence indicating that climate change may “accelerate the development and spread of drug-resistant infections,” she said.

As a cystic fibrosis patient, Ella Balasa has battled forms of antimicrobial resistance throughout her life. Credit: Ella Balasa

Balasa, the cystic fibrosis patient, now works as a patient advocate and consultant, a role in which she speaks about the importance of examining alternatives to antibiotics. She herself has found success with an experimental bacteriophage treatment. Bacteriophages are viruses that infect and destroy bacteria.

“Even if we develop new antibiotics in the future, bacteria are going to become resistant no matter what,” Balasa said. “And so, I really urge researchers and drug developers to think outside the box of the development of more traditional antibiotics. I just don’t think traditional antibiotics are a viable long-term solution.”

Another important piece of the puzzle, Paulin-Deschenaux emphasized, is prevention of infections in the first place, particularly in areas without strong health care systems and infrastructure.

“One of the best lines, really, for mitigating AMR is strengthening prevention: investing in clean water, sanitation, hygiene, and infection prevention practices, as well as immunization.”

The Air We Breathe

There’s more to the story than adaptability. A changing climate can also enhance bacteria’s ability to travel from one area of the globe to another.

AMR can spread through wastewater, such as when patients taking antibiotics pass remnants of the drugs as waste. When a natural disaster, such as a hurricane or flood, affects wastewater treatment plants, the spread can be dramatically sped up. Some research has even indicated that as glaciers melt, ARGs stored in the ice for thousands of years can be released into the environment.

AMR’s pathways through the soil can be affected by climate too. For instance, drought conditions can lead to desiccated soils that in turn lead to an escalation in the production of both antibiotics and ARGs.

Airborne bacteria are shown here, magnified 3,000 times by optical microscopy. Credit: Josef Reischig/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY SA 3.0

Drug-resistant pathogens can travel vast distances when they are aerosolized, or made small and light enough to be carried through the air: A 2024 study showed that aerosolized bacteria and fungi (including resistant species) can travel thousands of kilometers through the air.

But it’s “very, very hard to analyze the air microbiome,” in part because of the potential for contamination, said Fumito Maruyama, an environmental microbiologist at Hiroshima University who focuses on antibiotic resistance and pathogens in the natural environment. “That’s one reason why we still don’t know much about the air resistome.”

Maruyama and Salametu Saibu, an environmental microbiologist and postdoctoral researcher in his lab, introduced the concept of the “air resistome,” or the community of ARGs held in and traveling through the atmosphere, in a 2026 review paper.

Organisms carrying ARGs can enter the air via soil or water, then be redeposited in soil or water in a new location, Saibu explained. These particles can be inhaled by humans, potentially exposing them to antibiotic-resistant microorganisms or ARGs.

Here, E. coli is seen during the process of bacterial conjugation, a form of horizontal gene transfer. The thin appendages labeled “F-pilus” are conduits the microbes use to share DNA. Credit: Jonasz Patkowski/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

“When the temperature is warm, it enables transmission of antibiotic-resistant genes from one community to another community, from one bacterial population to another bacterial population,” Saibu said. “There’s no barrier, no barrier at all.”

But climate change is more than just higher temperatures. Cascading effects can lead to increased risk of disasters such as flooding, drought, and wildfires. Wildfires can worsen respiratory conditions, leading to increased hospital visits and antibiotic use.

A less studied link between wildfire smoke and AMR, Adler Tavella explained, is smoke’s potential ability to aerosolize resistant microbes and genes.

“Wildfire smoke should not be viewed only as chemical air pollution,” he said. “Fires can aerosolize microorganisms from soils, vegetation, and burned biomass, and smoke plumes can transport bacteria, fungi, spores, and other biological particles.”

Breathing is, of course, unavoidable, and taking stronger antibiotics to combat increasingly resistant bacteria contributes to a vicious cycle. Though antibiotics can pay off for shorter-term illnesses like Chavan’s bout of drug-resistant tuberculosis, AMR can leave patients with chronic illnesses, like Balasa, with few options. Though the bacteriophage treatment she began in 2020 has been beneficial, in the past few years, she’s been getting sick more frequently again.

“You can’t fully get rid of resistant pathogenic bacteria, at least not in the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome. They can’t be eradicated, and they are incessant and very resilient,” she said.

Drug-resistant pathogens can travel vast distances when aerosolized. This satellite video shows aerosols visible from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System model. Blue represents sea salt aerosols, pink is dust aerosols, orange/red is smoke from fires, and green is sulfates from pollution and volcanoes. Credit: NASA’s Global Modeling Assimilation Office (GMAO) and NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio (SVS) The One Health Approach

With a wealth of studies documenting the inequitable effects of climate change, it may come as no surprise that the highest number of drug-resistant infections occur in low- and middle-income countries, where health systems are the weakest. It’s another example of a dangerous feedback loop: With infections more common and high-quality diagnostics less common, people in these countries are more likely to get sick and less likely to receive the appropriate treatment.

“It’s a global issue, and we need to fight it together.”

A lack of treatment access, inappropriate or unregulated use of antimicrobials, and a dearth of resources that could prevent infection, such as clean water and immunization programs, make for a dangerous combination, said Paulin-Deschenaux. “That coming all together really is a melting pot for antimicrobial resistance.”

Researchers are largely united in viewing AMR as a problem requiring a multidisciplinary, global effort, or what WHO often calls a “One Health” approach. The approach recognizes that the health of humans, animals, plants, and the wider environment are linked. Therefore, the prevention, detection, and treatment of disease require collaboration between scientists, physicians, public health specialists, governments, industry, and even patients.

“Everybody must be informed about antibiotic resistance and about the environment, how we should take care of the environment for the next generation to come,” Saibu said. “It’s a global issue, and we need to fight it together.”‘

Across the globe, geoscientists are stepping up to the challenge.

In May 2026, WHO adopted an updated global action plan on antimicrobial resistance that outlined priorities, including raising awareness, enhancing surveillance systems and laboratory networks, improving infection prevention to reduce the need for antimicrobials, ensuring equitable access to and appropriate use of the drugs, and accelerating research into AMR. The report notes the growing importance of tackling the problem, suggesting that AMR could reduce global life expectancy by 1.8 years within a decade and cause up to 39 million deaths by 2050.

“Solving AMR will require much broader collaboration than we traditionally imagine,” said Lianping Yang, a public health scientist at Sun Yat-sen University who researches AMR and climate change. “If we want to protect antibiotics for future generations, we need to think beyond prescribing practices. We need a healthy environment, a healthy planet, a stronger health system, and better preparation for a changing climate.”

Moreover, Yang said, “sustainable development strategies are important for helping the global, especially the low- and middle-income countries to address the dual threats of climate change and AMR.”

—Emily Gardner (@emfurd.bsky.social), Deputy Editor

Citation: Gardner, E. (2026), Antimicrobial resistance is killing millions. Climate change is making it worse., Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260274. Published on 1 September 2026. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Behind the Veil of Journal Editing

EOS - Tue, 09/01/2026 - 12:00
Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

“Mysterious”, “a black box”, “I’m really not sure…”—these are phrases many early career researchers might use when discussing the editorial process of peer-reviewed scientific journals. Peer-review is esoteric as it is, and while most scientists become familiar with peer review as authors and, eventually, reviewers, very few receive formal training in how editorial decisions are made or how to evaluate manuscripts from the broader perspective of an editor (Gradoville and Deemer, 2022). The Early Career Editorial Fellows (ECEF) program, launched in 2024 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences (JGR: Biogeosciences) and GeoHealth, offers an opportunity to glimpse behind the veil of journal editing and gain that perspective. The program aims to cultivate the next generation of scientific editors by providing early-career researchers with hands-on editorial experience, mentorship, and exposure to the decision-making process (Xenopoulos and Nguyen, 2024). Through mentorship from experienced editors, fellows learn to evaluate research beyond their own areas of expertise, contribute to the broader scientific community, and develop the skills needed to become both capable reviewers and future editors. As the first cohort to complete the program in JGR: Biogeosciences, we wanted to share our experiences in the hope that more AGU journal editorial boards will  consider offering this opportunity.

We’ve learned the ropes of scientific publishing and journal editing from reviewer recruitment through synthesizing feedback and issuing editorial recommendations.

Over the past two years, we’ve learned the ropes of scientific publishing and journal editing from reviewer recruitment through synthesizing feedback and issuing editorial recommendations. Upon joining the editorial team, our role was primarily that of a reviewer as we familiarized ourselves with the editorial process under the guidance of mentors and demonstrated our ability to provide and recognize a useful peer review. Following this onboarding period, we transitioned into an associate editor (AE) role, actively handling manuscripts from start to finish. The workload was typically sporadic, with concentrated time spent reading incoming manuscripts, searching for and contacting reviewers, synthesizing feedback, and drafting recommendations for the handling editor. When revisions were recommended, we were typically looped back in upon resubmission to assess whether concerns were sufficiently addressed and if an additional review cycle was warranted.

Recruiting reviewers frequently emerged as the most time-consuming component of the overall process, consistent with recent trends in scientific publishing (Gradoville and Deemer, 2022). Compiling a qualified list required balancing topical expertise, career stage, geographic and gender diversity, and avoiding conflicts of interest,  then cycling through and appending the list as invitees declined, went silent, or failed to deliver promised reviews could stretch across several weeks. Once reviews were in, reconciling conflicting assessments was often the most mentally demanding task, requiring us to conduct an independent read of the manuscript to make a fair recommendation, particularly when the topic touched on areas outside our own expertise. Beyond handling manuscripts, we attended quarterly editorial board meetings and had opportunities to write ‘Editor’s Highlights’ for Eos, which challenged us to distill a paper’s core message and engage the broader scientific community to promote noteworthy new publications.

Within JGR: Biogeosciences, we worked one-on-one with mentors who were in the same or similar scientific fields, some of whom we may not have necessarily connected with otherwise. This mentorship was focused on expanding skills related to reviewing, evaluating reviews, and making editorial recommendations, which are skills that early career scientists do not often have dedicated time or mentorship to practice and learn, especially from mentors with differing perspectives on the editorial process.

In addition to hands-on editorial experience, the ECEF program also provided opportunities to network with scientists from a variety of fields, as well as with the broader AGU journals community. As ECEFs, we were invited to attend official and unofficial events at the AGU Annual Meeting. The Editors’ Dinner was an opportunity to reunite with editors we had worked with previously or seen at quarterly board meetings, as well as connect with editors from other AGU journals that we had never met. Being invited to be a part of the broader AGU journals community was an impactful experience, which highlighted the importance of having a community of scientists and journal staff that make our science visible. We were also invited to meetups with the other JGR: Biogeosciences editors to discuss matters relating to the journal and network in a more casual setting. These events allowed for more in-depth, personal conservations that seemed more productive than typical passing interactions at conferences.

Participating in the ECEF program fundamentally changed how we review manuscripts, write papers, and interact with journals.

Participating in the ECEF program fundamentally changed how we review manuscripts, write papers, and interact with journals. Viewing peer review from an editor’s perspective emphasized that the most valuable reviews are not those that identify the greatest number of minor issues, but those that assess a manuscript’s overall scientific contribution, clearly identify its key strengths and weaknesses, and provide constructive suggestions for improvement. It also helped us recognize that reviewers do not need to evaluate every aspect of a multidisciplinary study; instead, they can focus on making meaningful contributions within their own areas of expertise. Furthermore, the program changed how we view editorial decisions. Previously, we often regarded an editor’s decision as the final word. As one ECEF participant reflected, “Now, if I were in this situation again [of having a paper rejected despite positive reviews], I would email the AE and ask for additional clarification on their decision/make the case for why their decision should be revisited.”

As the inaugural fellowship concludes, one question naturally follows: Should other journals adopt similar programs? Our answer is simple: yes. High-quality scientific publishing depends on knowledgeable editors who can manage peer review fairly, efficiently, and transparently. Yet many editorial boards are under increasing pressure from rising submission rates, reviewer fatigue, and the growing complexity of modern publishing (AGU Editorial Network, 2024; Gradoville and Deemer, 2022). Editorial fellowships provide a structured pathway to develop future editors while strengthening journals today.

The benefits extend far beyond the fellows themselves. First, fellowships create a sustainable pipeline of well-trained editors, reducing reliance on a small pool of overburdened senior researchers. Second, they improve the quality of peer review by giving fellows a deeper understanding of editorial decision-making, publication ethics, and constructive reviewing. These skills extend into their own research, improving the manuscripts they write, the reviews they provide, and the guidance they offer colleagues and students. Third, fellowships diversify editorial leadership by bringing early-career researchers—and often individuals from underrepresented groups—into editorial decision-making, broadening perspectives, and strengthening the scientific community.

The journals themselves also benefit directly. Fellows contribute fresh perspectives on submission systems, reviewer guidance, and editorial workflows while expanding subject expertise and editorial capacity. Although mentoring fellows requires an initial investment from senior editors, our experience suggests that this is quickly offset as fellows become independent and begin sharing editorial responsibilities. Careful selection of participants, structured mentoring, and regular interaction among fellows can further maximize the effectiveness of these programs. The need for such initiatives has never been greater. Scientific publishing is adapting to the rapid rise of AI and large language models (LLMs), increasing concerns over publication ethics, reviewer fatigue, paper mills, and the continued growth of predatory publishing (AGU Editorial Network, 2024; Van Noorden, 2023). These challenges place increasing demands on editors to safeguard the integrity and credibility of the scientific peer review process.

Investing in the next generation of editors is ultimately an investment in the quality, credibility, and resilience of science itself.

Programs like the Early Career Editorial Fellowship offer a practical and much needed forward-looking solution. By training future editors through structured mentoring and real editorial experience, they strengthen peer review, build editorial capacity, and foster a culture of scientific integrity. Investing in the next generation of editors is ultimately an investment in the quality, credibility, and resilience of science itself. If journals are serious about protecting research integrity and strengthening peer review (Bohrer et al., 2026), they must invest not only in today’s editors, but also in training tomorrows.

—Bailey A. Murphy (murphyba@ornl.gov, 0000-0002-0399-5221), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States; Ceara J. Talbot (ctalbot@ucdavis.edu, 0000-0002-6227-6868), University of California, Davis, United States; Hongyan Bao (baohy@xmu.edu.cn, 0000-0002-9632-1487), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China; Kyle S. Boodoo (kyle.boodoo@univie.ac.at, 0000-0001-7063-5042), Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Austria; and Kendalynn A. Morris (kendalynn.morris@pnnl.gov, 0000-0002-0388-6965), Pacific Northwest National Lab, United States

Citation: Murphy, B. A., C. J. Talbot, H. Bao, K. S. Boodoo, and K. A. Morris (2026), Behind the veil of journal editing, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO265034. Published on 1 September 2026. This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s). Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer