EOS

Scientists agree that to have a chance of keeping the world’s warming below the Paris Agreement limit of 1.5°C (2.7°F), humanity needs most oil, gas, and coal to remain in the ground. This “unburnable” or “unextractable” carbon would not contribute to global carbon emissions.

But where, exactly, should we prioritize shutting down or banning fossil fuel activities? A new study published in PLoS One provides an answer for the Arctic with an atlas showing where oil and gas activities overlap with vulnerable ecosystems, important wildlife species, and Indigenous land.

“We’re investigating the idea of unburnable carbon with a geographical perspective,” said Daniele Codato, a geographer at the Università de Padova in Italy and lead author of the new study. “We focus on where to keep oil and gas underground.”

The atlas is meant to help decisionmakers prioritize areas where it is essential to avoid opening new frontiers or where current oil and gas extraction should be halted because of social, cultural, ecological, or climate justice criteria, he said.

Overlaps, Mapped

Codato and a team of researchers created their Arctic atlas with dozens of public datasets from five Arctic polities known to have oil and gas activities (Alaska (United States), Canada, Greenland (Denmark), Norway, and Russia). Though various geographic definitions of the Arctic exist, the team chose a boundary used to evaluate wildlife and conservation by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (the biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council, an intergovernmental organization focused on Arctic governance) to include the largest possible portion of vulnerable ecosystems.

The resulting maps revealed more than 512,000 square kilometers—an area about the size of Spain—of Arctic territory with existing or planned fossil fuel activities, including leases, areas under bid, exploration licenses, and infrastructure. Within those areas, the researchers counted 44,539 active wells and nearly 40,000 kilometers (about 25,000 miles) of pipelines.

Oil and gas wells in the Arctic are highly concentrated in northwestern Canada, northern Alaska, and northern Russia. The CAFF boundary identifies the Arctic region as defined by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (the biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council). Click image for larger version. Credit: Codato et al., 2026, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345775

Next, the researchers determined how oil and gas activities overlapped with protected areas defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and conservation priority areas defined by three other nongovernmental organizations. Fossil fuel activities threaten wildlife by altering habitats, disrupting migratory routes, and releasing pollutants.

Of the area containing oil and gas activities, more than 7% overlapped with ecologically protected areas, and more than 13% overlapped with the ranges of all of the three key Arctic species considered in the study: polar bears, yellow-billed loons, and caribou. The highest concentrations of oil and gas activities were in the Yamal Peninsula of Russia, northwestern Canada, and the North Slope of Alaska, all home to fragile ecosystems.

Seven percent of Arctic fossil fuel extraction areas mapped by the research team overlapped with ecologically protected areas. In some cases, such as in the Yamal`skij Nature Reserve in Russia (top right), protected area borders have been cut or delimited to avoid overlapping with protected area boundaries, possibly indicating that protected areas have been downsized or redesigned to accommodate fossil fuel infrastructure. ANWR = Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Click image for larger version. Credit: Codato et al., 2026, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345775 Mapping revealed that 87.21% of leases in Alaska and more than 13% of total Arctic concessions for fossil fuel activities overlapped with the ranges of all three of the key Arctic species considered in the study (polar bears (Ursus maritimus), caribou (Rangifer tarandus), and yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii)). Click image for larger version. Credit: Codato et al., 2026, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345775

The researchers also discovered that 73% of land with oil and gas activities overlapped with Indigenous Peoples’ lands, defined in the study as lands where Indigenous communities maintain significant influence over land management. Fossil fuel activities can threaten Indigenous communities’ health and ways of life, though the authors note that overlaps between Indigenous Peoples’ lands and fossil fuel activities do not necessarily indicate an opposition between the two.

Oil and gas concessions cover more than 4% of Indigenous Peoples’ lands (IPLs) in the Arctic. Click image for larger version. Credit: Codato et al., 2026, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345775

“It’s a really interesting idea to create an atlas of unburnable carbon and try to make visible where tensions might occur between Indigenous land, ecosystems, [and fossil fuel activities],” said Mariel Kieval, a researcher at the Arctic Institute, a nonprofit research organization. The overlaps noted in the atlas are an “initial indicator” providing opportunities for further research that zooms in on specific areas, she said.

Kieval also said the atlas could be helpful for local communities trying to identify where extraction activities are occurring nearby.

Policy Paradigm

The atlas’s effort to express the urgency of action to the public and policymakers is useful, said Paul Ekins, an economist at University College London who was part of the team that coined the term “unburnable carbon.” “Any way in which atlases or discussions or slogans can up the political ante so that politicians become braver in seeking to address this issue is to be welcomed.”

In particular, Codato hopes the atlas will fuel a “paradigm shift” in global policy that would ultimately ban the proliferation of fossil fuel activities in the Arctic.

The need for an intergovernmental ban on fossil fuel activities is evidenced by the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, Codato said: The refuge received temporary protections against drilling under the Biden administration, but the Trump administration plans to open the refuge for oil and gas leases this summer. “We need something stronger” to avoid such administration-by-administration changes in Arctic protections, he said.

“If we don’t start to ban fossil fuels in the Arctic now, it could become another sacrifice zone.”

Such a paradigm shift will be more important than ever as warming in the Arctic provides new access to resources and opportunities for trade that may accelerate ecological and cultural disruptions. “If we don’t start to ban fossil fuels in the Arctic now, it could become another sacrifice zone,” like some parts of the Amazon rainforest, Codato said.

Policy actions have fallen far behind the science, Ekins said. “There should have been an agreement not to exploit fossil fuels in the Arctic well before the ice had melted to a sufficient extent to make that a practical possibility.”

In 2023, the research team published a similar atlas identifying unburnable carbon in the Ecuadorian Amazon and plans to continue to expand their atlas to include the rest of the world. The team is currently working on projects that cover Brazil, Italy, Nigeria, and the United Kingdom.

Codato said he hoped the Arctic atlas would inform discussions to update the European Union’s Arctic policy that are scheduled to occur this year.

—Grace van Deelen (@gvd.bsky.social), Staff Writer

Citation: van Deelen, G. (2026), This Arctic atlas shows where oil and gas activities overlap with wildlife and Indigenous communities, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260139. Published on 7 May 2026. Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Dust and water ice clouds are ubiquitous on Mars; they regulate the planet’s climate and can affect measurements of other atmospheric components. Constraining their spatial and temporal variability is also essential for improving Martian general circulation models.

Fedorova et al. [2026] use solar occultation measurements from the SPICAM infrared spectrometer on board the Mars Express orbiter to characterize nine Martian years (MY 28 through 36) of dust and water ice clouds. Because the spectrometer could not distinguish between these particles’ types, the researchers employ a new method integrating Mars Climate Sounder data and general climate model predictions to identify them.

The analysis reveals that the particles can reach altitudes up to 80 kilometers during perihelion, while their size remains relatively uniform with height. This suggests that Martian dust distribution is driven more by atmospheric dynamics and horizontal transport, capable of lifting and moving particles over vast distances, rather than by turbulent mixing against gravity alone.

The study also provides a detailed seasonal and spatial climatology of major Martian atmospheric features, including the Polar Hood Clouds, the Aphelion Cloud belt, and the Mesospheric Clouds. The detection of high-altitude clouds (70–90 km) during dust events confirms enhanced transport of water vapor into the upper atmosphere during both global and regional storms. These findings are consistent with simultaneous observations from the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite on the Trace Gas Orbiter.

These observations show that large-scale atmospheric dynamics, rather than local mixing alone, control how aerosols are distributed vertically on Mars, with important implications for the transport of water to the upper atmosphere and the planet’s climate evolution.

The figure shows how the water ice cloud layers vary with latitude and season (Ls), based on SPICAM observations. (a) altitude of the cloud layer in kilometers; (b) thickness of the cloud (optical depth); (c) average size of the ice particles in micrometers; and (d) number of particles within the layer (number density. The background color is the amount of dust in the atmosphere from Montabone et al. [2015]: red areas indicate high dust levels, while dark blue areas indicate low dust. Black open circles mark locations where no clear water ice clouds were detected. Credit: Fedorova et al. [2026], Figure 12

Citation: Fedorova, A. A., Luginin, M., Montmessin, F., Korablev, O. I., Bertaux, J.-L., Stcherbinine, A., & Lefèvre, F. (2026). Multiyear monitoring of aerosol vertical distribution on Mars by SPICAM IR/MEX. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 131, e2025JE009388. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JE009388  

—Arianna Piccialli, Associate Editor, and Beatriz Sanchez-Cano, Editor, JGR: Planets

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

A wonderful new paper on the huge Tracy Arm landslide and tsunami will have profound but challenging implications for the management of risk in an age of increased tourism and rapid climate change.

The journal Science has published an excellent new paper (Shugar et al. 2026) that examines the extraordinary 10 August 2025 landslide and tsunami at Tracy Arm fjord in Alaska. The paper is open access, so you can read it for yourself (it is very accessible), and there has been a plethora of media coverage (quite rightly).

I wrote about this event at the time and in the aftermath, but Shugar et al. (2026) is the authorative source. There is little for me to add to the science, but AGU Eos has a really excellent write up and explainer that I thoroughly recommend.

That large landslides occur in fjords is not a surprise, and that they can generate enormous displacement waves is also not news. We know that landslide occurrence in these environments in general is increasing, and specifically so in Alaska. However, this paper is the most comprehensive and systematic analysis of such an event, and it has shown the remarkable threat that these events can generate. The tsunami created by this landslide had a 481 metre run-up; it is remarkable that there were no fatalities. If a large cruise ship had been in the area, with passengers being ferried ashore on small boats and exploring the shoreline, the consequences would have been catastrophic. It is unsurprising then that cruise companies are now amending their itineraries.

The USGS released the image below of the aftermath of the landslide and tsunami – scale is hard to understand in such images, but the crown of the landslide is over 1,000 metres above the level of the fjord, and the landslide had a subaerial volume of over 63 million cubic metres.

This aerial photo shows the north side of Alaska’s Tracy Arm Fjord in the aftermath of the 2025 landslide and tsunami. The lighter-colored rock is the exposed surface, where the mountainside collapsed and fell into the water. The foot of South Sawyer Glacier is visible at lower right; in decades past, the ice extended much farther and was thick enough to hold the rock slopes in place. Credit: Cyrus Read/U.S. Geological Survey

Shugar et al. (2026) has a brief section that examines the implications of this event, and of the understanding that it provides of the hazards posed by very large landslides in fjord settings. These are locations with extensive human activity – local communities, trade, fishing and tourism. There is some evidence that these landsldies are more likely to occur in the spring and summer months, when human occupation is higher. Our resilience to a tsunami wave that starts off being hundreds of metres high is low.

A case in point lies in Milford Sound in New Zealand, where (for example) an earthquake on the Alpine Fault has the potential to trigger a large landslide that could result in a major tsunami. Milford Sound is an extremely popular tourism location. Should such an event occur, and mass fatalities result, there is no doubt that the public inquiry would find that the societal risk was known and that it was probably unacceptable. However, to ban tourism, including cruise ships, in this area would carry heavy risks in its own right – it would profoundly impact the vital tourist economy of the area, on which many livelihoods depend. This is a substantial risk in its own right, and of course politics plays a major part too. Balancing these risks is a major challenge for any society.

Some hope is offered by the fact that this landslide showed substantial precursory seismic activity, which might represent a route to providing a warning for at least some of these rock slope failures. But research in this area is immature at the moment, and of course there will be no warning for a landslide triggered by a major earthquake.

So, the landslide at Tracy Arm fjord presents us with a host of major challenges, but it also represents a big step forward in our understanding of these events. Well done to Dan and his colleagues for another brilliant paper. I shall watch the debate with great interest.

Reference

Shugar et al. 2026. A 481-meter-high landslide-tsunami in a cruise ship–frequented Alaska fjord. Science, eaec3187. DOI:10.1126/science.aec3187

Return to The Landslide Blog homepage Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

In the early morning of 10 August 2025, a mountainside collapsed into the waters of Tracy Arm Fjord in southeastern Alaska.

This massive landslide produced a tsunami that reached 481 meters on the opposite side of the fjord—higher than all but the world’s 14 tallest buildings—and registered on seismic detectors around the globe. For days after the slope collapsed, the waters of the fjord churned with a standing wave known as a seiche.

This drone video shows a man paddling through the iceberg-filled Tracy arm fjord in the aftermath of a landslide. Credit: Bill Billmeier

This event was the second-largest tsunami ever recorded and the largest not linked to an earthquake. A new paper published in Science presented strong evidence that the Tracy Arm landslide was instead the result of the rapid retreat of South Sawyer Glacier, itself a consequence of global climate change.

“It’s like if you have a kid and they said they cleaned their room but really all they did was throw everything in the closet. As soon as you open that door, everything falls out.”

Nobody was harmed by the rockslide or tsunami, but cruise ships were scheduled to visit the fjord later that morning. If the collapse had happened just a few hours later, it could have been disastrous.

“While the [South Sawyer] Glacier is in the fjord, it’s supporting those valley walls, like the buttresses on a cathedral,” said Daniel Shugar, a geomorphologist at the University of Calgary who led the study. “As that glacier retreated over the last few decades, it retreated just past the spot that did fail. It’s like if you have a kid and they said they cleaned their room but really all they did was throw everything in the closet. As soon as you open that door, everything falls out.”

This animation shows an overhead view of the 10 August 2025 Tracy Arm landslide. Credit: Patrick Lynett, University of Southern California

In other words, the glacier that carved the fjord in the first place was also holding its slopes in place, and the ice’s retreat under warming temperatures exposed rock that became vulnerable to crumbling. The proximate cause of the landslide might have been something else—as Shugar noted, rainfall is plentiful in that part of Alaska, which could have weakened the fjord’s walls further—but it might also have been a combination of small, individually insignificant factors. In any case, the removal of that glacial “closet door” was what made the collapse and tsunami possible.

“We know that steep slopes are very sensitive to the things that climate [change] is exacerbating, whether it’s losing permafrost, glacier retreating, or more water in the soil,” said glaciologist Leigh Stearns of the University of Pennsylvania, who was not involved with the Tracy Arm study. “Often, we think of glacier retreat as a long and continuous thing, but [it] can trigger sudden catastrophic events.”

This aerial photo shows the highest run-up resulting from the 10 August 2025 landslide-triggered tsunami in Tracy Arm. It was captured during a U.S. Geological Survey field reconnaissance overflight on 13 August 2025. Credit: John Lyons/U.S. Geological Survey.

The researchers shared their findings at a press briefing on Wednesday at the European Geosciences Union 2026 General Assembly.

Debuttressing and Slope Instability

The Tracy Arm tsunami, like the record-setting Lituya Bay 524-meter megatsunami in 1958, was so dramatic in part because it happened in a fjord. The steep sides of the relatively narrow channel concentrated the energy generated by the rockfall into water.

A drone video shows the tsunami-affected part of the fjord, including the highest run-up area and the landslide itself. Credit: Bill Billmeier

Unlike Lituya Bay, which resulted from an earthquake, Tracy Arm provided very little seismic warning before the slope collapsed, requiring forensic work to determine what caused it.

Shugar noted that South Sawyer Glacier had retreated by roughly 500 meters in the spring of 2025 alone, on top of the general trend of shrinking and thinning over the decades. And it’s not alone: Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) images taken by satellites indicate that many slopes in Alaska and beyond are in motion, pointing to potential future danger.

“Not every single one, but it seems like a huge majority of [shifting slopes] are above the lower parts of thinning glaciers,” Shugar said. He described this phenomenon as “debuttressing,” as in losing the glacial buttress holding a slope up. He added, “I think in the next 5 years or so, we’ll probably have a much better understanding of just how and how quickly slopes respond to that debuttressing.”

Threats, Hazards, and Climate Change

“We were unbelievably lucky that the [tsunami] occurred with the timing that it did, and not 5 hours later.”

Most tsunamis are set in motion by earthquakes and travel across the open ocean, wreaking their destruction when they reach shallower water near coasts; the word “tsunami” means “harbor wave” in Japanese. The Tracy Arm tsunami joined the ranks of other landslide-driven tsunamis, like the ones in Taan Fiord (Alaska) and Dixon Fjord (Greenland), in being linked to human-driven climate change. Beyond the immediate impact of the waves, this category of hazard requires rethinking potential risks from abrupt catastrophes like debuttressing as well as slower effects such as sea level rise.

“The risk to any particular cruise ship [from a tsunami] on any particular day is very low,” Shugar said. “We were unbelievably lucky that the [tsunami] occurred with the timing that it did, and not 5 hours later. The risk certainly still could be increasing as we build new settlements, new mining camps, or new oil and gas infrastructure.”

Both Shugar and Stearns highlighted the importance of learning lessons from Tracy Arm and related events.

“Climate is a threat multiplier, and the research is really forcing us to look at these cascading hazards,” Stearns said. Tracy Arm “is one example of this: Small slow changes can trigger big events. Hopefully, we don’t need so many disasters to spur some change.”

A drone video shows Sawyer Island in the Tracy Arm Fjord and evidence of the tsunami on the fjord walls. Credit: Bill Billmeier

—Matthew R. Francis (@BowlerHatScience.org), Science Writer

Citation: Francis, M. R. (2026), The forensics of a skyscraper-sized tsunami, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260140. Published on 6 May 2026. Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: AGU Advances

In low Earth orbit (typically below about 700 kilometers altitude), atmospheric drag is the primary source of uncertainty when predicting the trajectories of satellites. These prediction errors largely arise from limitations and inaccuracies in the models used to estimate the density of the upper atmosphere, particularly within the thermosphere.

Mutschler et al. [2026] introduce a new method for estimating atmospheric density along the path of an individual satellite by using Energy Dissipation Rates (EDRs). The derived single-satellite density measurements provide valuable insight into variations in thermospheric density and can help characterize how the upper atmosphere responds to disturbances such as geomagnetic storms. Incorporating these observations can contribute to ultimately improving the accuracy of satellite orbit predictions.

Effective density and Space Force effective density estimated by the Kosmos 1508 satellite (plotted on the right-hand y axes) compared to estimates from satellites Swarm-A and Swarm-C (plotted on the left-hand y-axes). Credit: Mutschler et al. [2026], Figure 17a

Citation: Mutschler, S., Pilinski, M., Zesta, E., Oliveira, D. M., Delano, K., Garcia-Sage, K., & Tobiska, W. K. (2026). First results of a new inversion tool for thermospheric neutral mass density computations during severe geomagnetic storms. AGU Advances, 7, e2025AV002079. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV002079

—Alberto Montanari, Editor-in-Chief, AGU Advances

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.