Feed aggregator

Why Healthy Soils Matter More Than Ever

EOS - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 14:19
Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

Protecting soil health is essential to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) since it has direct impacts on food and water security, ecosystem health, and socio-economic activities. However, human-induced drivers and pressures heighten the susceptibility of soils to degradation.

A new article in Reviews of Geophysics explores the drivers, impacts, and efforts to combat soil degradation. Here, we asked the authors to give an overview of soil degradation, practices being implemented to combat it, and what questions remain.

What is soil degradation and why is it important to study?

Soil degradation refers to the deterioration of soil quality resulting from unsustainable human activities most commonly associated with agricultural, pastoral, industrial, and urban land use. It involves a dynamic reduction in the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil that diminishes its structural integrity, functional capacity, and overall resilience over time.

Studying soil degradation is important because it is a major global environmental challenge that threatens soil security, ecosystem services, agricultural productivity, and human well-being. It also makes land more susceptible to droughts, floods, landslides, and climate extremes. Soil degradation often develops gradually and may remain unnoticed until critical thresholds are reached, after which recovery can be extremely slow, costly, or even impossible. Understanding the causes, processes, and consequences of soil degradation is therefore essential for preventing long-term environmental and socio-economic damage and for supporting sustainable land management and ecosystem resilience.

What are the key processes that degrade soil?

The key processes of soil degradation can be grouped into physical, chemical, and biological degradation. Physical degradation includes the breakdown of soil structure, aggregate loss, compaction, reduced porosity and pore connectivity, and erosion caused by water, wind, tillage, or crop harvesting. These processes remove topsoil, nutrients, and organic matter while reducing the capacity of soil to retain water. Chemical degradation includes acidification, alkalization, nutrient depletion or excess nutrient accumulation, loss of soil organic matter and soil organic carbon, salinization, sodicity, and contamination by toxic chemicals or pollutants. Biological degradation involves declines in soil biodiversity, microbial activity, and overall biological functioning. These processes rarely occur independently; rather, they interact and reinforce each other thus increasing the susceptibility of soil to further degradation.

What are the major drivers of soil degradation and how do they differ from perturbations?

The major drivers of soil degradation are long-term natural or anthropogenic forces that initiate or accelerate the physical, chemical, and biological processes of soil degradation. These include deforestation, unsustainable agricultural practices, land-use change, industrial and mining activities, climate change, and overgrazing. These drivers place continuous pressure on the environment and gradually reduce soil functioning. In contrast, perturbations are typically short-term disturbances such as floods, droughts, extreme weather events, wildfires, or sudden land-use changes that temporarily disrupt soil ecosystems and their resilience. The distinction between drivers and perturbations lies primarily in their duration and persistence. When disturbances occur repeatedly or continue over long periods, they can become long-term drivers of degradation.

Drivers and pressures contributing to soil degradation, indicating the complex socio‐economic and environmental interactions that contribute. Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 1

How do scientists measure soil degradation at different spatial scales?

Scientists quantify soil degradation using complementary approaches across multiple spatial scales. At local or field scales, direct surveys and monitoring quantify physical, chemical, and biological indicators of soil health and degradation. These measurements are supported by expert assessments and land-user knowledge gathered from interviews or questionnaires. Analytical frameworks then combine these indicators to evaluate soil functions and ecosystem services under different land management practices. While field observations provide detailed and localized evidence, they are difficult to scale, require repeated monitoring, and depend on context-specific indicator thresholds.

At regional, national, continental, and global scales, assessments combine bottom-up, top-down, and hybrid methods including expert mapping, soil sampling, modeling, and remote sensing. High-resolution satellite imagery and remote sensing technologies enable continuous, large-scale monitoring of land cover, vegetation dynamics, erosion, soil moisture, and other indicators associated with soil degradation. These assessments are increasingly supported by big data analytics, high-performance computing, and advanced machine learning models that integrate diverse datasets and improve the detection and prediction of degradation patterns.

At the microscopic scale, a wide range of experimental and modeling techniques can be employed to characterize the parameters and processes governing the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils, thereby providing insights into the mechanisms that contribute to soil degradation.

What are some of the restoration efforts or practices being implemented to combat soil degradation?

Efforts to restore degraded soils range from large-scale policy initiatives to practical land management strategies. At the national level, restoration projects such as China’s rehabilitation program on the Loess Plateau have successfully restored millions of hectares of degraded land. In Europe, international agreements to reduce transboundary air pollution have decreased acid deposition and promoted the recovery of acidified soils.

Global distribution of improved land management and restoration measures as applied in restoration scenarios (van der Esch et al., 2021). Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 4a

At the field scale, restoration focuses on minimizing further degradation while rebuilding soil health. Reducing vehicle traffic is encouraged to minimize soil disturbance and prevent compaction. Agricultural practices include reduced or no-tillage farming, crop rotation, agroforestry, cover crops, compost and manure application, integrated pest management, and efficient irrigation methods such as drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting. These practices improve soil structure, enhance soil fertility, reduce erosion, increase organic matter, and strengthen the long-term resilience of agricultural soils while supporting sustainable land management.

Why is combating soil degradation essential for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals?

Combating soil degradation is recognized as a fundamental prerequisite for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to the extensive socio-economic and ecological impacts of soil health. Healthy soils provide natural capital and ecosystem service delivery that directly support human well-being. Preventing soil degradation is essential for ensuring global food security, maintaining agricultural productivity, supporting livelihoods, and reducing hunger and poverty. Furthermore, maintaining soil functionality is strictly necessary for preserving water security, regulating the climate, and supporting overall ecosystem health. Consequently, sustainable soil management contributes directly to several SDGs, including SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Failure to combat soil degradation can lead to severe socio-economic consequences such as health crises driven by desert dust storms and widespread human migration, which would completely undermine the environmental resilience demanded by the SDGs.

What are the remaining questions or knowledge gaps where additional research is needed?

Several important knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of soil degradation. One major challenge is the lack of a universally accepted definition of soil degradation. This inconsistency makes it difficult to compare studies and establish standardized indicators and assessment methods. In addition, many global and national assessments are fragmented, outdated, or lack long-term monitoring data.

Global climate simulations help scientists understand how the atmosphere, oceans, and land interact. These high-resolution models improve our ability to study environmental processes and assess how climate may influence soil degradation and ecosystem health. Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 31

Further research is needed to improve understanding of how multiple drivers interact, how quickly degradation develops, and whether soils can fully recover after pressures are removed. Scientists also need a better understanding of the links between climate, land use, and soil processes, as well as the socio-economic impacts on livelihoods, inequality, and migration. Improving monitoring methods, data sharing, and standardized protocols will help produce more reliable assessments and support more effective soil management and restoration strategies.

—Nima Shokri (nima.shokri@tuhh.de, 0000-0001-6799-4888), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany; Mehdi Afshar (0000-0002-4411-3299), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany; and Milad Aminzadeh (0000-0002-0074-3600), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany

Editor’s Note: It is the policy of AGU Publications to invite the authors of articles published in Reviews of Geophysics to write a summary for Eos Editors’ Vox.

Citation: Shokri, N., M. Afshar, and M. Aminzadeh (2026), Why healthy soils matter more than ever, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO265026. Published on 22 July 2026. This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s). Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Might Make Flights Smoother

EOS - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 13:14
https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/eos-activities.html?url=EOSURL

Stomach-churning dips and swerves can be the most unpleasant—and dangerous—part of flying. To travelers’ chagrin, climate change has already begun to make such aircraft turbulence more common, as it alters the movement of air masses at the heights where planes fly.

Researchers wondered whether stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a controversial climate intervention strategy to cool the planet by injecting sunlight-blocking aerosols into the stratosphere, could help. In a study published last month in Environmental Research Letters, a team modeled aircraft turbulence under future climates with and without SAI. The researchers found that climate intervention could, indeed, reduce aircraft turbulence, even below modern-day levels.

“SAI is very important, but on the other hand, it’s very dangerous,” said study author Hye-Yeong Chun, an atmospheric scientist at Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea. “These results show that aviation turbulence is quite significantly reduced [with SAI]—so this is one merit, at least, on the SAI side.”

A Bumpy Future

Climate change isn’t warming the planet evenly; the poles are heating up faster than the equator. This imbalance shrinks the temperature difference between the rising masses of cool and warm air that meet to form the jet stream, a fast-moving current of air that swirls like a river around the globe near 9,100 meters (30,000 feet) in elevation. The lower temperature difference weakens the jet stream, making it wavier and prone to wind shear, or changes in wind speed or direction over short distances. Because wind shear is one of the primary causes of aircraft turbulence, plane rides are getting bumpier, explained Chun.

“[Turbulence is] a very intermittent and localized phenomenon. Even current weather forecasting models and high-resolution numerical models cannot directly predict turbulence.”

But turbulence is also one of the trickiest weather elements to predict, she said. Unlike turbulence from storms or clouds, which is visible and easier to forecast, so-called clear-air turbulence can’t be seen by pilots. “It’s a very intermittent and localized phenomenon,” said Chun. “Even current weather forecasting models and high-resolution numerical models cannot directly predict turbulence.”

Understanding turbulence and how the jet stream is changing is important “not only for comforting people, but also for reduction of greenhouse emissions,” said Tommaso Alberti, a physicist at Italy’s Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia who was not involved with the study. Turbulence can increase a plane’s fuel requirements as it readjusts, while taking advantage of a strong jet stream can shrink flight times and associated carbon emissions.

Since the phenomenon can’t be directly predicted, scientists like Chun use proxies—other measurements that indicate potential regions where turbulence might occur. In the new study, she and her colleagues used a measure called the Ellrod index, which combines data on vertical wind shear and the stretchiness of masses of air.

The researchers modeled how the Ellrod index would change across seven climate futures with varying amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, three of which had no human intervention and four of which had SAI. They found that although climate change should increase aircraft turbulence across nearly all latitudes, SAI could reduce such increases by up to 60%. And to Chun’s surprise, SAI was powerful enough not only to counteract future turbulence but also to reverse modern-day levels of climate-driven turbulence. One possible explanation is that depending on where the aerosols get injected, SAI cools the tropics more strongly than the poles, counteracting the shrinking temperature difference that forces the jet stream out of balance.

Global Tactics, Global Implications

“We have to find the optimal way to reduce temperature but, on the other hand, reduce any potential side effects.”

Though the study results are promising, they are far from a green light to conduct climate intervention, said Chun. Still, the goal set forth in the Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 2°C above preindustrial levels will not be easy to achieve, she said. “We have to find the optimal way to reduce temperature but, on the other hand, reduce any potential side effects.”

With global climate interventions such as SAI, a top concern is that any side effects will occur throughout the world, ranging from changes in rainfall to disruptions to the ozone layer. The most commonly proposed aerosol, sulfur dioxide, can also cause acid rain as it falls out of the atmosphere.

Ramalingam Saravanan, an atmospheric scientist at Texas A&M University who was not involved with the study, said that researching SAI in “controlled and safe conditions” had its merits. But as a longtime modeler, he said, “There are all kinds of errors in models that we are still working with…saying ‘This is what will happen’ in a model may not exactly be what will happen in the real world.”

In turn, Saravanan worried that private individuals or companies pushing to enact climate intervention might overstate the benefits to airplane turbulence. “Focusing on potential modest benefits of a radical and uncertain mitigation approach, as this study does, risks deflecting attention away from the inherently large dangers of climate intervention,” he clarified in an email.

Alberti noted that artificial intelligence models may eventually be able to forecast clear-air turbulence, providing a less risky solution for dealing with the hazard. However, he noted that would only be a way to adapt to climate-driven turbulence, not mitigate it.

Chun said that she was not yet advocating for the actual implementation of SAI but that researching it is critical if global leaders are to consider such a strategy. AGU’s Ethical Framework Principles for Climate Intervention Research acknowledges that such geoengineering approaches shouldn’t move forward without an internationally agreed-upon ethical governance structure but states that “more knowledge about climate intervention approaches and their consequences will help society make informed, just decisions about the deployment of climate intervention.”

“The risk is quite significant,” Chun said. “Scientists have to work very hard to save lives, to save our planet.”

—Hannah Richter (@hannah-richter.bsky.social), Science Writer

This news article is included in our ENGAGE resource for educators seeking science news for their classroom lessons. Browse all ENGAGE articles, and share with your fellow educators how you integrated the article into an activity in the comments section below.

Citation: Richter, H. (2026), Stratospheric aerosol injection might make flights smoother, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260237. Published on 22 July 2026. Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Reflooding the Aral Sea could prevent massive CO₂ emissions

Phys.org: Earth science - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 12:40
About 90% of the Aral Sea has dried up. The exposed sediments have already released enormous amounts of carbon dioxide (748 megatons) since 1960. However, through restoration, the lake could once again become a carbon sink. This is shown by a study by the Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), published in Science, in which the Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) participated. Hydrological restoration of the desiccated sediments would prevent emissions equivalent to Spain's total emissions over three years—namely, around 605 megatons, according to the research team's calculations.

Redesigning Farmland Through Community Collaboration in California

EOS - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 12:00
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Community Science

California is experiencing major changes in how farmland is used as recent policies seek to protect groundwater resources. These changes are reshaping both the landscape and the lives of rural residents, especially in communities like Fairmead in Madera County, which is surrounded by water-intensive almond orchards.

In Community Science’s special collection on Transdisciplinary Collaboration for Sustainable Agriculture, Katrak-Adefowora et al. [2026] describe a project that engaged Fairmead residents and farmers in redesigning a small almond farm into a landscape that reflects multiple community priorities. The new landscape includes a basin that captures stormwater to reduce flooding and help replenish groundwater, native plants that improve habitat, and a walking path for community recreational use. Community members and farmers were engaged through workshops, outreach, and educational activities, with the project team remaining flexible and responsive to local input.

This paper shows how involving communities in landscape decisions from the beginning can lead to solutions that are both environmentally beneficial and responsive to local priorities. It also offers a practical collaborative model for other regions facing similar land-use and water challenges, demonstrating how partnerships among residents, farmers, nonprofits, businesses, local governments, and scientists can support more resilient communities.

Citation: Katrak-Adefowora, R., Massell, A., Ortiz, V., Vizcarra, A., Nelson, B., & Fernandez-Bou, A. S. (2026). Community-driven solutions for groundwater resilience in California. Community Science,5, e2025CSJ000167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025CSJ000167

—Claire F. Beveridge, Editor, Community Science Exchange

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Stokes-Einstein-like scaling across fluidized and caged transport regimes in a driven complex plasma

Physical Review E (Plasma physics) - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 10:00

Author(s): Adrian Scurtu, Dorina Ticoş, Nicoleta Udrea, Maria L. Mitu, Beatrice Paraschiv, and Cătălin M. Ticoş

The Stokes-Einstein (SE) relation links microscopic fluctuations to macroscopic dissipation. Whether it survives in driven-dissipative, strongly coupled systems far from global equilibrium remains an open question. Using a macroscopic dust vortex in a radio-frequency complex plasma, we isolate therm…


[Phys. Rev. E 114, 015215] Published Wed Jul 22, 2026

Fatal landslides in May 2026

EOS - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 05:57

In May 2026 I recorded 51 fatal landslides causing 185 fatalities. 2026 is proving to be atypical in terms of the temporal pattern of fatal landslides.

This is my regular update for the number of fatal global landslides, focusing on May 2026. As usual, this data has been collected in line with the methodology described in Froude and Petley (2018) and in Petley (2012). References are listed below – please cite these articles if you use this analysis. Data presented in these updates should be treated as being provisional at this stage as I will reanalyse them prior to formal publication, and other events will emerge.

Note that this data excludes landslides triggered by earthquakes (see below).

The headline figures are as follows:

May 2026: 51 fatal landslides causing 185 fatalities.

This is the monthly number of landslides by month in 2026 to the end of May:-

The number of global fatal landslides in 2026 by month to the end of May.

Last month I noted that 2026 was proving to be atypical in terms of the pattern of fatal landslides. This has continued through May, with the total number recorded in this month being lower than for both February and March. This may indicate that patterns of rainfall this year are different from the norm. More research is needed.

My preferred way of presenting this data us to use the cumulative total by pentad. This graph is to pentad 30, which ends on 30 May:-

The cumulative total number of global fatal landslides in 2026 by pentad to the end of May.

So, to 30 May 2026 the cumulative total number of fatal landslides was very significantly higher than the long term mean and above the exceptional year of 2024. However, note that the cumulative total was very close to the 2024 total – this year did not experience the early acceleration in the rate of cumulative landslides that we saw in 2024.

As always the final annual total will heavily depend upon rainfall patterns in East and South Asia in the northern hemisphere summer months.

Major events included the multiple landslides in Yongchuan, Chongqing, China on 24 May.

The 8 June 2026 M=7.8 earthquake in the Philippines also triggered landslides – to date I have recorded six separate events causing 31 fatalities, but this may be incomplete.

I am now working on the June 2026 data.

References

Froude, M. and Petley, D.N. 2018.  Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016.  Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 18, 2161-2181.

Petley, D.N. 2012. Global patterns of loss of life from landslidesGeology 40 (10), 927-930.

Return to The Landslide Blog homepage Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Urgent cuts to global greenhouse gas emissions needed to avoid worst sea-level rise flooding in the UK, study shows

Phys.org: Earth science - Wed, 07/22/2026 - 01:00
A pioneering study has revealed that by the turn of the next century, at least half a million more people in the UK will be at risk of coastal flooding—a 25% increase compared with now. The research, led by the Met Office and the University of Bristol, quantifies for the first time the scale of the UK population at risk from coastal flooding under future sea level rise projections.

Simulations show distinct ground motion signatures of supershear earthquakes

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 22:40
Sustained supershear earthquake ruptures produce distinct ground-motion characteristics compared with subshear earthquakes, according to a study published in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, with potential implications for current building codes and ground-motion models.

Satellite imagery captures the impact of large U.S. dams on river temperatures over the last decade

Phys.org: Earth science - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 20:10
A team of Virginia Tech geoscientists has found a new way to examine the widespread effects of dams on river temperatures: using Landsat thermal infrared imagery to gather data on rivers across the United States. By using satellite imagery instead of site-specific, on-the-ground measurements, researchers can draw from a much larger pool of data.

Lunar water cycle and D/H fractionation driven by solar wind implantation and micrometeorite impacts

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Chuanjiao Zhou, Hong Tang, Xiongyao Li, Bing Mo, Wen Yu, Dan Zhu, Yuanyun Wen, Jianzhong Liu

Constraining on- and off-fault nonlinear dynamic rupture parameters via hierarchical Bayesian inversion for the 2019 Mw 7.1 ridgecrest earthquake

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Zihua Niu, Maximilian Kruse, Linus Seelinger, Nico Schliwa, Heiner Igel, Alice-Agnes Gabriel

The role of plate tectonic-like behaviour in the long-term climate evolution of Earth

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Takashi Nakagawa

Information-variation constrained seismic tomography for enhanced geological modeling of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Junjie Hao, Yuqi Huang, Ying Liu, Max Moorkamp, Haijiang Zhang

Birth of the viru microplate triggered by Pacific-Farallon plate reorganization

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Josephine K. Joergensen, Maria Seton, R. Dietmar Müller

Magnesium isotopes constrain connectivity and environmental resilience among ocean basins during the Early Triassic

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Zhongya Hu, Weiqiang Li, Robert J. Newton, Sylvain Richoz, Yasufumi Iryu, Satoshi Takahashi, Takumi Maekawa, Zhiguang Xia, Shouye Yang, Shu-Zhong Shen, Hua Zhang

Insight into long-term seismic behavior from an 8500-year paleoseismic record on the Altyn Tagh fault, Northwest China

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Zhaode Yuan, Gang Hu, Tao Li, Zhigang Li, Jintang Qin, Yashi Sui, Feng Yin, Jingxing Yu

The origin of the post-Marinoan <sup>17</sup>O-depleted barite

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Tingting Chen, Yongbo Peng, Lan-Lan Tian, Nan Sun, Wei Wei, Fang Huang

Sodium chloride hydrates provide an archive of ocean fluid freezing rates at icy worlds

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Rachael E. Hamp, Mark G. Fox-Powell, Peter Fawdon, Christoph G. Salzmann, Jessica P. Hogan, Milz L. Beaumont, Liam Perera, Stephen P. Thompson

Editorial Board

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s):

The KTB monazite fission-track profile: initial insights into ultra-low temperature thermochronology from a natural laboratory

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Tue, 07/21/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 September 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 690

Author(s): Toru Nakajima, Shigeru Sueoka, Shoma Fukuda, Georgina E. King, Takahiro Tagami

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer