EOS

Syndicate content Eos
Science News by AGU
Updated: 1 day 21 hours ago

Enhancing Induced Seismicity: A New Window into Earthquake Physics

Tue, 07/28/2026 - 12:00
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Unlocking the physics of natural and induced earthquakes remains a major challenge. Gischig et al. [2026] performed the “Mzero” hydraulic stimulation experiments within the BedrettoLab, which aimed to find a stimulation procedure to enhance seismicity up to an induced moment magnitude (Mw) 0 earthquake. The multi-sensor network enabled detailed measurements of pressure, fluid flow, and deformation during the stimulations. Some experiments were conducted in a pre-conditioned rock mass, where fluids had previously been injected at pressures just below the fault reactivation threshold.

The results show that earthquake evolution, migration, and magnitude strongly depend on both the injection procedure and the site’s stimulation history. Pre-conditioning induced a mainshock-aftershock sequence and altered rock deformation and fluid flow patterns. In contrast, experiments without pre-conditioning produced no mainshock but exhibited higher seismicity rates and more pronounced outward migration of micro-earthquakes.

These findings are highly relevant for developing strategies to mitigate or even suppress injection-induced felt earthquakes in geo-energy applications.

Citation: Gischig, V. S., Meier, M.-A., Lambiase, A., Jiang, D., Hertrich, M., Gholizadeh Doonechaly, N., et al. (2026). Hydraulic stimulation experiments attempting to enhance induced seismicity for earthquake physics research. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 131, e2026JB033768. https://doi.org/10.1029/2026JB033768

—Birgit I. Mueller, Associate Editor, JGR: Solid Earth

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

The 17-21 May 2026 landslides in Shimen County, Hunan, China

Tue, 07/28/2026 - 07:18

Satellite images show two very large landslides and multiple smaller failures, and channelised debris flows, in Shimen County in China.

In China, this year rainy season started with an intense event that covered the provinces of Guizhou, Hubei and Hunan in the period between 17 and 21 May 2026. There were some news reports at the time, although the story disappeared quite quickly. One area that was seriously affected was Enshi Tujia and Miao autonomous prefecture, which I have highlighted previously.

However, news reports also suggested a major impact in Shimen County in Hunan Province, which impacted 23 townships with 103,247 residents were affected. One news report indicates that about 340 mm of rain fell in 24 hours. There was some imagery of the aftermath of landslides. One article from Hong Kong reports 16 dead and missing in this area.

Planet Labs has now managed to capture some good imagery of the aftermath of the rainfall event in Shimen County. The area affected is around: [29.9428, 110.5510]. Planet Labs captured an image on 27 June 2026 using their PlanetScope instruments:-

Planet Labs image of the May 2026 landslides in Shimen County, China. Image copyright Planet Labs, used with permission, draped onto the Google Earth DEM.

There are two very large landslides in the image (and highlighted below). The one with the marker is about 3.5 km from the crown to the main drainage line, although one could argue that the runout distance is about another kilometre beyond that point. Note that the image shows that this landslide was valley-blocking and that a small lake has developed. There is a Sentinel image from 23 July 2026 that shows that this lake was still intact.

Planet Labs image of one of the May 2026 landslides in Shimen County, China. Image copyright Planet Labs, used with permission, draped onto the Google Earth DEM.

The other large landslide, also seen in the above image, is about 3 km long and 450 m wide. Elsewhere there are many smaller landslides, although some of these are over a kilometre in length:-

Planet Labs image of the smaller May 2026 landslides in Shimen County, China. Image copyright Planet Labs, used with permission, draped onto the Google Earth DEM.

It is notable that these landslides have generated very serious channelised debris flows in the main drainage lines, which appear to have extended over a distance of many kilometres. There is evidence of severe damage to the infrastructure in the channels.

This intense cluster of landslides occurs in an area of about 20 km x 7 km. Clearly, in this zone there must have been very exceptional rainfall, greater than in adjacent areas.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to Planet Labs for use of the imagery.

Return to The Landslide Blog homepage Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

The Role of Tidal Wetlands in the Global Nitrogen Cycle Under Global Change

Mon, 07/27/2026 - 17:21
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Earth’s Future

It is always encouraging when a new study improves our understanding of a process or compartment within the global nitrogen (N) cycle. This is certainly the case of the recently published study by Langley et al. [2026].

Drawing on an extensive dataset comprising of 8,012 soil N measurements from 255 tidal wetlands, including both salt marshes and mangroves, the authors show that these ecosystems act as important sinks for nitrogen. This stored nitrogen, referred to as blue nitrogen, is buried alongside carbon in wetland soils (see figure above).

The study estimates that tidal wetlands account for approximately 13-15% of marine nitrogen burial, highlighting their role as major hotspots of N accumulation in coastal environments. By retaining nitrogen that would otherwise be transported to adjacent waters, these ecosystems help mitigate harmful environmental impacts such as eutrophication, toxic algal blooms, and water quality degradation.

However, the capacity of tidal wetlands to provide this valuable ecosystem service is increasingly threatened by human-driven environmental change. Rising sea levels may enhance nitrogen sequestration in some wetlands, but only where these ecosystems can persist. If wetlands are degraded or lost, the consequences could be severe. Rather than functioning as N sinks, they may become net sources of N, releasing previously stored N back into aquatic systems and exacerbating the very problems they currently help to alleviate. Thus, conserving and restoring tidal wetlands is essential, not only for blue carbon storage, but also for maintaining their critical role in regulating the coastal nitrogen cycle.  

Citation: Langley, J. A., Chapman, S. K., Wang, L., Maxwell, T. L., Rivera, P., Adame, M. F., et al. (2026). Blue nitrogen follows the fate of tidal wetlands. Earth’s Future, 14, e2025EF006747. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006747

—Luis Lassaletta, Associate Editor, Earth’s Future

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

The Hidden Costs of Mining River Sand

Mon, 07/27/2026 - 16:50
Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

Sand and gravel mined from riverbeds serve as essential raw materials for concrete, asphalt, and other construction materials across the world. But the processes of extracting these critical natural resources have serious environmental and ecological consequences.

A new article in Reviews of Geophysics examines where and how much sand and gravel are mined across the world, and the environmental and societal impacts. Here, we asked the authors to give an overview of sand and gravel mining, the challenges of studying the impacts, and what questions remain.

What are the primary uses of river sand and gravel?

River sand and gravel are the most heavily mined solid materials globally.

River sand and gravel, collectively known as aggregates, are the most heavily mined solid materials globally, serving as the literal backbone of modern urban infrastructure and economic development. Their primary application is in the construction industry, where they constitute over 70% of concrete by volume, alongside applications in asphalt production and building foundations.

River sand is uniquely prized and irreplaceable for concrete manufacturing due to its distinct, naturally weathered properties. Unlike desert sand, which is too fine and rounded, river sand possesses sharp, angular grains that provide the critical granular friction and structural bonding required for robust concrete mixes. Additionally, it is entirely non-saline, making it far superior to marine sand, which contains salts that corrode steel reinforcement structures within buildings and bridges. Beyond concrete and asphalt, massive volumes of river sand are used directly for land reclamation projects to engineer new land space in coastal cities before major building construction begins.

Where are river sand and gravel mined across the world?

Globally, total demand for sand and gravel used in concrete production reached an estimated 28.03 billion tonnes in 2024, spanning at least 65 countries that we identified through our literature review. While sand and gravel mining (SGM) is a global phenomenon, extraction activities and consumption patterns are highly unevenly distributed, with dramatic hotspots concentrated in rapidly developing regions.

Asia stood as the dominant epicentral region for aggregate demand in 2023, consuming an estimated 23.02 billion tonnes annually, driven overwhelmingly by booming urbanization and infrastructure expansion. Within Asia, China is the world’s largest consumer by a wide margin, extracting 6.07 billion tonnes of sand and 8.10 billion tonnes of gravel in a single year to support its construction sector. India ranks as the second highest global consumer, where sand mining is heavily concentrated in peninsular rivers during the dry season and gravel extraction dominates the Himalayan foothills. Vietnam is the third largest consumer globally, with intense, mechanized dredging occurring throughout the Mekong and Red River deltas.

Outside Asia, substantial and rising riverine extraction pressures are documented across Africa, particularly in Egypt, Algeria, and Nigeria, and South America, especially along large tropical systems such as the Paraná and Tocantins rivers in Brazil. Conversely, in Europe and North America, contemporary aggregate extraction has largely shifted away from active riverbeds toward marine sources, floodplain quarries, and crushed rock.

What are the environmental and ecological consequences of SGM?

The environmental and ecological consequences of sand and gravel mining are severe, cascading from localized physical disruptions into widespread ecosystem degradation.

The environmental and ecological consequences of sand and gravel mining are severe, cascading from localized physical disruptions into widespread ecosystem degradation. Instream extraction directly excavates the riverbed, creating dredge pits and other erosional features, while the resulting sediment deficit can generate a “hungry water” effect when removal exceeds natural replenishment. This imbalance promotes further riverbed incision, downstream and upstream erosion, and severe bank instability that may induce seasonal riverbank collapse. In deltas, channel deepening can allow seawater wedges to migrate farther inland, resulting in salinity intrusion that damages agricultural land and compromises freshwater security. Furthermore, vertical incision alters surface water–groundwater interactions, lowers adjacent water tables, and may impair alluvial aquifer recharge. Water quality can also deteriorate as heavy machinery and suction dredging resuspend bottom sediments, producing turbidity plumes, reducing dissolved oxygen, and potentially remobilizing sequestered contaminants, heavy metals, and excess agricultural nutrients.

Ecologically, these physical changes cause immediate habitat destruction. Benthic and macroinvertebrate communities may be buried or displaced, while critical spawning grounds for gravel-dependent fish species are removed or degraded. Together, these stressors reduce habitat complexity, alter algal and aquatic communities, and can drive broader biodiversity loss, threatening vulnerable river-dependent species and the long-term structural resilience of major river systems.

Sand and gravel mining can trigger a cascade of river-system impacts, from channel incision, bank erosion, and altered sediment transport to degraded habitats, reduced water quality, and wider risks for ecosystems and river-dependent communities. Credit: Park et al. [2026], Figure 13

Why is it challenging to study the impacts of SGM?


Studying the impacts of SGM is exceptionally challenging due to deep data scarcities, institutional opacity, and the complex biophysical scales of river networks. A primary obstacle is the severe under-reporting and prevalence of illegal mining operations; official government statistics and company reports frequently miss the true scale of extraction, with measured physical volumes often doubling or tripling officially declared numbers. Furthermore, international trade data (like the UN Comtrade database) is plagued by contradictory records between importing and exporting nations, treating sand as a homogeneous commodity while masking its exact geographic origin. Methodologically, much of the intense extraction occurs underwater, hidden from public view. Tracking these changes requires expensive, logistically demanding, and highly technical bathymetric sonar surveys that must be maintained over years to isolate mining signatures from natural seasonal erosion or the impacts of upstream dams. Finally, there is a pronounced spatial-temporal mismatch. The socio-economic demand driving SGM often originates thousands of miles away in urban centers or across international borders, while the geomorphic and ecological impacts propagate dynamically both upstream and downstream, making it difficult to establish clear, direct cause-and-effect chains for policy design.

What is the “Driver-to-Management Pathway” framework?

The “Driver-to-Management Pathway for Sustainable Sand and Gravel Mining” (DMP-SGM) framework is a comprehensive, four-stage systemic structure introduced to unify the historically fragmented scientific understanding of global extraction activities. It serves as an analytical bridge linking macro-level economic forces to local biophysical changes and regulatory responses.

The first stage, Drivers, identifies and quantifies the socio-economic and demand-side pressures fueling extraction, such as rapid urbanization, industrial production, and land reclamation. The second stage, Extent, focuses on mapping the precise spatial distribution, temporal variations, and physical magnitudes of sediment removal. The third stage, Impact, systematically examines how these physical extraction footprints alter river systems, tracing the pathways through which hydrogeomorphic changes (such as riverbed incision, turbidity plumes, and bank collapse) cascade into downstream ecological degradation and socio-economic vulnerabilities. The final stage, Management, outlines governance interventions, emphasizing the need to integrate technical work—such as real-time vessel monitoring, numerical modeling, and the mapping of Sustainable Mining Zones (SMZs)—with adaptive top-down regulations, international cross-border policies, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. This framework closes the feedback loop, ensuring policy limits are directly informed by biophysical sediment replenishment rates.

The Driver-to-Management Pathway for Sustainable Sand and Gravel Mining links the forces driving extraction to its spatial extent, environmental and ecological impacts, and possible management responses. The framework highlights where better data, monitoring, and governance are needed to support more sustainable river sand and gravel mining. Credit: Park et al. [2026], Figure 2a

What are some of the remaining knowledge gaps?


Despite an accelerating volume of research, profound knowledge gaps remain where additional scientific efforts are critically needed to guide sustainable resource management. Geographically, research remains heavily clustered around a few high-profile hotspots such as in China and Vietnam, leaving emerging mining fronts across rapidly urbanizing regions of Africa and South America largely undocumented and limiting the global transferability of management strategies. Thematically, the literature is heavily dominated by physical hydrogeomorphic perspectives. Quantitative, empirical studies that measure the direct, long-term impacts of SGM on aquatic biodiversity, food security, human health, and local livelihoods remain rare and are frequently treated as secondary components rather than primary research foci. Mechanistically, the exact thresholds and baseline rates of natural sediment replenishment are poorly constrained for most global rivers, leaving policy makers unable to establish geomorphically sustainable extraction caps.

Furthermore, additional research is urgently required to standardize remote sensing detection algorithms that can accurately track small-scale, artisanal mining operations across diverse geographic regions. Finally, a critical gap exists in understanding the compound, non-linear interactions between SGM and other systemic anthropogeomorphic stressors, such as climate change, relative sea-level rise, land subsidence, and upstream sediment trapping by hydropower dams.

—Edward Park (geo.edpark@gmail.com; 0000-0002-1299-1724), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; and Christopher Hackney (0000-0001-5390-9136), Newcastle University, United Kingdom

Editor’s Note: It is the policy of AGU Publications to invite the authors of articles published in Reviews of Geophysics to write a summary for Eos Editors’ Vox.

Citation: Park, E., and C. Hackney (2026), The hidden costs of mining river sand, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO265027. Published on 27 July 2026. This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s). Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

What Australian Lakes Showed Us About Martian Hydrology

Mon, 07/27/2026 - 12:49
Source: Earth and Space Science

The expansive red bluffs of Western Australia’s Yilgarn Craton give the landscape a Martian appearance. It turns out the resemblance is more than superficial: The Yilgarn Craton also shares geological characteristics with lakes in Mars’s Terra Sirenum region. Plattner et al. recently characterized those shared features to shed light on the region’s aqueous history and its potential to have supported life.

The Yilgarn Craton contains thousands of acidic and saline lakes that undergo repeated wet-dry cycles. The researchers sampled 40 lakes during both the wet and dry seasons to assess how they change through time. These extreme environments are shaped by the interplay of groundwater, evaporation, and surface processes, generating a remarkable diversity of geochemical conditions. The mineral fingerprints preserved across these landscapes record long-lived groundwater activity and recurring wet-dry cycles, offering clues to how similar water-rock interactions may have shaped potentially habitable environments on the Red Planet.

The geochemistry of lake beds varied widely in response to these hydrologic fluctuations, the researchers found. In some shallow lakes, salt was the predominant mineral that accumulated. In others, a wider variety of minerals, including aluminum-rich clays and iron oxides, built up over time. Acidity and salinity levels also varied.

Some Australian lakes show depositions similar to craters in the Terra Sirenum region on Mars, suggesting that similar hydrologic processes might have taken place over the planet’s history. In some cases, the findings contradict long-held notions that magmatism must have shaped portions of Mars’s surface.

Even though these combinations of salts and acidic minerals indicate extreme lake conditions, the lakes in Western Australia still support diverse microbial life, suggesting that Terra Sirenum might be one of the best places to look for evidence of potential life on Mars, the authors wrote. (Earth and Space Science, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EA005066, 2026)

—Saima May Sidik (@saimamay.bsky.social), Science Writer

Citation: Sidik, S. M. (2026), What Australian lakes showed us about Martian hydrology, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260244. Published on [DAY MONTH] 2026. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

A Changing Climate Will Lead to More AC in Wealthier Countries, and More Deaths in Poor Ones, New Report Suggests

Mon, 07/27/2026 - 11:19
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news that impacts science and scientists today.

It’s well-documented that climate change is killing people.

A few months ago, the University of Chicago’s Climate Impact Lab released a report that found that, by 2050, about 10 times as many heat-related deaths would occur in poor countries as in richer ones.

Today, the same lab released a new report. This one found that the regions most affected by extreme heat are also the regions least likely to have increased levels of electricity to power the air conditioning that might provide relief. Use of cooling-related electricity is projected to grow seven times more in middle-income countries than in low-income countries in response to climate change.

“Air conditioning is a life saver, and climate change will no doubt lead to more AC adoption in today’s wealthy countries. Our research finds, however, that in too many countries around the world people will not be able to respond in the same way. The result is one of climate’s great cruelties—lots of death in the very countries that have contributed the least to climate change,” Michael Greenstone, a co-founder of the Climate Impact Lab, said in a statement.

 Related

The researchers describe “mortality cooling trap” areas, or locations where increased electricity consumption would most improve human welfare and save lives, but where such increases in consumption are not projected. The 18 identified countries are home to 676 million people, and about 377,000 people in these areas are projected to die each year beginning in 2050, thanks to the combination of hotter temperatures and low projected increases in energy consumption.

Most of the areas are in northern sub-Saharan Africa, in countries such as Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, and Niger, with others in southern Asia, including Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal, and Pakistan.

This chart shows countries in the “mortality-cooling trap,” in decreasing order of the percentage of their population that live in mortality-cooling trap regions. Click to enlarge. Credit: Adaptation Roadmap: Energy, Climate Impact Lab, July 2026

The analysis accounted for deaths caused explicitly by heat, such as heat stroke, as well as related deaths, such as heat-related disease or cardiovascular stress, Genevieve Maricle, executive director of the Climate Impact Lab, said in an email to Eos.

Maricle told Eos that one of the most striking parts of the report to her was the differences in the death tolls between lower-income and higher-income countries, even when those countries have similar climates. For instance, Saudia Arabia faces high temperatures similar to those in Niger, but the projected increase in electricity use per person is approximately nine times higher in Saudia Arabia than Niger. The report found that by 2050, heat will claim 27,000 more lives per year in Niger than it will in Saudi Arabia.

“The disparity in projected deaths between regions is striking and lays bare how tightly climate resilience and energy are bound together,” Maricle wrote. “The communities facing the most extreme heat are also locked out of the cooling that could protect them – a deadly combination of maximum exposure and minimum defense.”

—Emily Gardner (@emfurd.bsky.social), Deputy Editor

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about science or scientists? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Reactivation of the Mauao landslide in Mount Maunganui, New Zealand

Mon, 07/27/2026 - 06:53

A significant reactivation occurred over the weekend of the 22 January 2026 Mauao landslide in Tauranga.

Loyal readers will remember my posts on the Mauao landslide in Mount Maunganui in New Zealand on 22 January 2026, which killed six people. Over the weekend, heavy rainfall caused the landslide to reactivate. Fortunately, in this case there have been no fatalities.

1News has a video of the immediate aftermath of the landslide, shot by a local resident. It includes this still of the immediate aftermath:-

The aftermath of the reactivation of the Mauao landslide in New Zealand. Still from a video posted by 1News.

Meanwhile, Charlie Rahiri from Tauranga City Council has posted this video explaining the situation:-

Tauranga City Council reports that there have been three landslides in recent days at the Mauao landslide site. The head scarp has retrogressed about 20 metres and 8,000 m3 of material has moved over a maximum distance of about 100 metres.

It was an interesting choice to film the video directly at the foot of the debris given that the slope is considered to be unstable and the mass is, in the words of the council, “saturated, mobile and fluid“.

The rear scarp of the landslide remains steep and quite tall, so further reactivations of the Mauao landslide cannot be precluded. This is strong evidence that the situation remains very challenging, but also that New Zealand is well versed in terms of managing these risks.

Taranga City Council has an excellent webpage dedicated to updates regarding the Mount Mauao landslide.

Return to The Landslide Blog homepage Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Io’s Hidden Heat Revealed for the First Time

Fri, 07/24/2026 - 10:46
Source: Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Io—Jupiter’s third-largest moon—is constantly kneaded and deformed by the gravitational pull of Jupiter and two of its other moons, Europa and Ganymede. The resulting friction inside Io generates extreme internal heat, fueling volcanoes that erupt all over its surface. In fact, Io is more volcanically active than any other world in our solar system.

Nearly all prior observations of Io’s heat have relied on infrared measurements that could detect temperatures only at the moon’s very outermost “skin.” Now, Brown et al. have taken Io’s internal temperature for the first time.

The researchers used data captured by the Microwave Radiometer instrument aboard NASA’s Juno spacecraft—which has orbited Jupiter since 2016—during close flybys of Io in December 2023 and February 2024.

These data revealed Io’s thermal emissions at microwave wavelengths, which are longer than infrared, enabling the researchers to peer beneath the surface for tens of meters. Their analysis involved identifying and removing portions of the data representing reflections of the sky on the moon’s surface. The goal was to be left with observations truly representative of Io’s characteristics.

These observations showed that the upper tens of meters of Io’s surface are strongly heated by internal processes. Two possible explanations that fit the data are that heat may rise steadily through a conductive layer near the surface and that heat from recent lava flows or hot vents may escape to the surface through thin patches of cooling crust, with the latter being more likely on the basis of the existence of tall mountains.

Further analysis of the microwave observations revealed more about Io. The data suggest that Io has a relatively smooth surface, similar to Earth’s plains. They also suggest that Io has an upper layer with a lower density than solid rock, perhaps similar to volcanic ash or pumice, which likely lies atop denser material several meters below.

These findings and further analysis of Juno’s Microwave Radiometer data could lead to a deeper understanding of Io, particularly the mechanisms by which it loses internal heat and how heat flow patterns may differ across its surface. This work could also help to inform the design of microwave-detecting instrumentation for future missions to Io or other rocky and icy worlds. (Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JE009622, 2026)

—Sarah Stanley, Science Writer

Citation: Stanley, S. (2026), Io’s hidden heat revealed for the first time, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260234. Published on 24 July 2026. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

One Billion Years Ago, Northern Minnesota Nearly Split Apart. Now, Two Companies Want to Mine the Aftermath.

Fri, 07/24/2026 - 10:45
Want updates from a trusted source about U.S. mining developments? Preference Eos in your searches! Go to Google

In April, President Donald Trump officially revoked a ban on mining that had protected more than 225,000 acres (91,054 hectares) of federal land in Minnesota’s Superior National Forest from mineral exploration and development.

“It’s official. The illegal mining ban put in place by former President Biden has been overturned indefinitely, ending a reckless policy that sidelined Minnesota’s miners and undermined our nation’s ability to source our own materials,” Rep. Pete Stauber (R-Minn.) said in a statement after the repeal.

The action stoked new public concern about two proposed mines near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, a remote, million-acre part of Superior National Forest peppered with interconnected lakes and streams. The NewRange Copper Nickel company’s NorthMet mine, a joint venture of PolyMet Mining Corporation and Teck Resources, would be located approximately 20 miles (32 kilometers) from Boundary Waters in the St. Louis River watershed, which drains into Lake Superior. The Twin Metals Minnesota mine, owned by the multinational mining company Antofagasta PLC, would be located even closer to Boundary Waters and within the Rainy River watershed, which ultimately drains into Lake of the Woods, a lake shared by the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Manitoba as well as Minnesota.

Trump’s repeal of the mining ban is just the latest step in a yearslong battle over the future of mining in northeastern Minnesota, which is a magnet for recreationists and mining companies alike because of a geologic past that created pristine lakes atop rich deposits of critical minerals.

A Rift in the Bedrock

The deposits targeted by NewRange and Twin Metals were formed as a result of a rifting event that took place in the Proterozoic eon, roughly a billion years ago, during which the North American continent was expanding and breaking apart, said Adam Simon, a geologist at the University of Michigan who studies mineral deposit formation. “You can literally think of it as a crack or unzipping of the crust.”

The rift ran from the northeastern corner of Lake Superior, through what is now southwestern Minnesota, and into current-day Iowa and Kansas. The separation of the continent reduced pressure on Earth’s interior, which allowed molten rock to rise from the mantle to just below the surface, and some even erupted at the surface as lava flows. Molten rock from Earth’s mantle contains high concentrations of metal sulfide minerals of interest to mining companies today, including copper, gold, silver, platinum, cobalt, nickel, and chromium.

The rifting event that formed the Duluth Complex stretched across the Great Lakes Region and created intrusions of magma (colored in red) rich in valuable minerals. Credit: Wikimedia Commons/USGS, Public Domain

This uplift of magma, followed by hundreds of millions of years of erosion from glaciers, eventually formed what geologists now know as the Duluth Complex, a roughly 100-mile-long (161-kilometer-long) area north of Duluth, Minn., rich in metal sulfides.

Sulfate Streams

Today, Minnesota is the “Land of 10,000 Lakes,” and many residents worry about the potential impacts of mining in the water-dominated landscape.

The main concern is sulfate, a by-product of the separation of metals from the sulfide minerals that encompass them. Mining companies typically try to contain sulfate by storing mining waste in underground pits and chemically treating water that has been used in mining processes, though mining is still a significant source of sulfate in natural waters.

Though sulfate itself is not harmful to wetland ecosystems, it can cause a range of ecological issues once it is chemically transformed, said Amy Myrbo, a geologist and environmental consultant in Minneapolis. Naturally occurring bacteria in lake bed mud transform sulfate to sulfide, which creates hydrogen sulfide, a substance harmful to plants, when dissolved. In Minnesota, wild rice is an edible wetland grass that serves as an important food source and sacred plant to Indigenous groups; it reacts poorly to water high in sulfide. Additionally, the process can make water browner, fuel algal blooms, and increase freshwater concentrations of a harmful, bioaccumulative form of mercury.

“It’s a really underappreciated contaminant.”

Sulfate is “a really underappreciated contaminant” in fresh water, she said.

Though mines themselves are prohibited within the Boundary Waters area, environmental advocates are concerned that sulfate pollution from mine waste could flow in the wilderness’s waterways. The Boundary Waters wilderness is particularly susceptible to the nutrient-increasing effects of sulfate because its lakes tend to have a high amount of organic matter in their sediments, Myrbo said. “If we get sulfate pollution there, it could really be a problem.”

Minnesota is the only state with a sulfate water quality standard, meant to protect waters used for wild rice production. That standard is one of the only measures keeping the two proposed mines from moving forward, as dozens of wild rice waters are located within watersheds where the two proposed mines would be located.

Controlling Mine Waste

Open-pit mines are common in Minnesota, where iron deposits can be found at very shallow depths. The NewRange mine, though not an iron mine, would also be open-pit.

The Twin Metals project, however, would be an underground mine. Mining this way “significantly reduces the surface environmental impact,” Simon said. “What they’re essentially doing is surgically removing the ore underground.”

Still, separating metals from sulfide minerals creates mining waste high in sulfate, a slurry-like substance called mine tailings. Twin Metals plans to control this waste by drying it and compacting it into a mound that will then be “reclaimed with native soil and vegetation,” a method called dry stacking.

NewRange Copper Nickel plans to store its tailings in an existing facility provided by a closed iron mine. The company states that its methods will “clean up water quality issues from legacy iron ore mining and processing, leading to net reductions in loading of mercury and sulfate in the St. Louis River.”

“If someone says they’re going to open a sulfide ore mine without environmental contamination, they’re saying, ‘We’re going to be the first ones to ever do this.’”

Environmental advocates doubt that either company has an infallible plan to contain its waste because of the track record of similar mining projects. For example, one report commissioned by Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness in 2025 reviewed eight hard-rock mines in the United States and found that all eight had degraded downstream water quality. A 2012 report from the environmental advocacy group Earthworks that reviewed 14 copper mines (representing 89% of U.S. copper production according to the most recent data at the time) found that each of the mines had experienced at least one spill or accidental release of mine waste.

“If someone says they’re going to open a sulfide ore mine without environmental contamination, they’re saying, ‘We’re going to be the first ones to ever do this,’” said Steve Emerman, a geologist and environmental consultant. Emerman advises the Friends of the Boundary Waters, an advocacy group, on the effects of mining on the wilderness area.

NewRange Copper Nickel and Twin Metals did not respond to requests for comment.

—Grace van Deelen (@gvd.bsky.social), Staff Writer

Citation: van Deelen, G. (2026), One billion years ago, northern Minnesota nearly split apart. Now, two companies want to mine the aftermath., Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260239. Published on 24 July 2026. Text © 2025. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Trump’s Science Adviser Wants to Overhaul “Increasingly Calcified” U.S. Science Enterprise While Science Funding Lags

Thu, 07/23/2026 - 15:05
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news regarding law and policy changes that impact science and scientists today.

23 July: This article was updated to include comments from Jennifer Jones and Colette Delawalla.

A report released this week directs the U.S. government to spark a “new golden age” of science by ushering funds toward artificial intelligence, fostering closer relationships with private industry, and dismantling and rebuilding the federal science funding process.

The report was written by Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. He outlined his recommendations to Congress at a hearing of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on 22 July. 

Kratsios intended the report to emulate a letter written to President Franklin D. Roosevelt by Vannevar Bush in 1945, called Science, the Endless Frontier, which set the foundation for the current U.S. federal science process in which federal funds support university research. “As we celebrate the United States’ 250th anniversary, we have the responsibility to renew our foundations once more,” he wrote.

Kratsios listed four goals to guide this approach to U.S. science: to “prioritize the individual scientist over legacy institutions,” to “fundamentally change how research dollars are allocated, distributed, and assessed,” to “set clear scientific goals and build the industrial muscle to translate scientific discovery into technological strength,” and to “prepare our research enterprise for the AI revolution.”

“If you think about this report in the context of everything else this administration has done, it really is about weakening independence, weakening accountability, [and removing] scientific integrity protections in favor of empowering political appointees,” said Jennifer Jones, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Science-A-New-Golden-Age_EosDownload

The report recommends a handful of federal priorities to achieve these goals, including the Genesis Mission, a “national effort to harness AI for scientific discovery at a scale no other nation can match” led by the Department of Energy (DOE).

At the 22 July hearing, Kratsios said the Genesis Mission “is the crown jewel of American AI for science” and announced that federal agencies have committed more than $5 billion to the project. So far, 278 awards have been made, the largest being a three-year, $60 million grant for a project that will “help deliver nuclear facilities faster and safer” with the use of AI, according to the DOE. 

“There’s no mention of scientific integrity, no mention of protections for independence, it’s just the opposite.”

“There are some examples in STEM where AI is valuable,” such as increasing power in computational modeling or identifying new Earth-like planets at scale, for example, wrote Colette Delawalla, founder of science advocacy group Stand Up for Science, in an email. “But AI will never replace curiosity-driven scientific advancement,” she wrote. 

Some scientists viewed the report as a way for the government to justify steering research funds toward private industry and increasing political interference in science. “I think they’re trying to turn it into a venture capital model,” Jeremy M. Berg, a computational biologist and former director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the National Institutes of Health, told The New York Times

“Under the hood,” the report is a “vision for faster technology development and commercialization while underinvesting in the fundamental research, expert peer review, and scientific workforce that make those advances possible,” Keivan Stassun, an astrophysicist and member of the National Science Board prior to its dissolution by the Trump administration, told Science.

What’s interesting about the report, Jones said, is what it doesn’t mention. “There’s no mention of scientific integrity, no mention of protections for independence, it’s just the opposite,” she said. “There are no clear systems of accountability” explained in the report, and its suggestion to funnel funds to individual researchers rather than institutions such as universities also means more research could occur outside of universities’ established and robust systems of accountability, she added.

The recommendations in the document largely align with recommendations made by former National Academy of Sciences president Marcia McNutt in June. In the annual president’s address, McNutt encouraged the scientific community to “better understand the needs of industry” and embrace the use of AI to increase research efficiency. 

At the hearing, however, Kratsios agreed with Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX), chair of the committee, that the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine required more federal oversight, especially in light of its recent report on climate attribution science that Babin said raised “transparency concerns.” Kratsios said he looked forward to working with Congress to codify the recommendations made in the “new golden age” report.

Funding the Golden Age

The vision the report presents is accompanied by recommendations from Kratsios and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, for the FY 2028 budget. These recommendations include prioritizing funding for physical sciences, including quantum physics, chemistry and materials sciences, mathematics and computer sciences, engineering, and biological sciences. 

For FY 2028, “agencies should align their R&D investments, where appropriate, with the Administration’s national missions,” the report states, listing those “national missions” as AI, quantum computing, fusion power, the construction of a lunar base and return of humans to the Moon, autonomous robotics, and semiconductor technology. 

 
Related

At the 22 July hearing, Democrats argued that the Trump administration’s actions have worked against the stated goals of Kratsios’s report. “Big new initiatives and promises mean nothing when agencies act capriciously, canceling grants midway, delaying awards for months, even after they’ve been selected through the rigorous merit review process, and blacklisting educational and research institutions,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA).

The report did not mention the Trump administration’s proposed FY 2027 budget, which, if finalized, would reduce the National Science Foundation’s budget by 53%, the U.S. Geological Survey’s budget by 37%, the NASA science budget by 42%, and NOAA’s budget by 28%.

“I anticipate the report will be used as the rationale for making further cuts in the budgets and staffing of federal research agencies while limiting their authority and accountability to the American people,” Neal Lane, former director of the NSF, told Science

The report also did not mention recent sweeping cuts to the NSF’s FY 2026 budget, the fact that the NSF currently has no director, or a June proposal from the Office of Management and Budget that, if finalized, would give political appointees final approval power for scientific grants.

—Grace van Deelen (@gvd.bsky.social), Staff Writer

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about how changes in law or policy are affecting scientists or research? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Small Faults Add to Seattle’s Quake Story

Thu, 07/23/2026 - 13:09

The winter earthquake of 923 or early 924 CE remains the benchmark event in the Seattle Fault Zone. It lifted shorelines around Puget Sound and gave geologists one of the most decisive records of the fault’s power.

But that shoreline-lifting earthquake is only part of the zone’s history. A recent Geological Society of America Bulletin study led by Stephen J. Angster, a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, looks past the most famous Seattle fault earthquake to examine evidence of earthquakes on lesser-known secondary faults.

At Lytle Beach on Bainbridge Island and at Vasa Park near Bellevue, subtle landforms and trench records suggest evidence of smaller ruptures has been preserved in the landscape but not fully recognized.

At Lytle Beach, the first clue was a small, raised surface. Angster described the “localized uplifted terrace” as “the first feature we saw that drew our eye to that area.” Similar features had already helped geologists read other secondary faults in the Seattle Fault Zone.

For instance, Angster said the Toe Jam Hill fault became one of the better-known examples when lidar helped reveal its scarp through dense vegetation. Later work found smaller uplifted terraces near similar secondary structures, which Angster said may indicate separate earthquake events focused on smaller faults rather than the larger regional rupture.

However, Lytle Beach stood out in a different way, as its fault dips south, in contrast to the zone’s better-known secondary faults, which dip north.

Faults Hidden in the Fold

Finding the localized uplifted terrace was only the beginning for Angster, who used lidar to uncover scarps and lineaments through the region’s forest cover.

His team also utilized ground-based magnetic transects across the Lytle Beach fault to look for changes that may reveal displacement beneath the surface. In addition, they gained a more direct view of disturbed sediments by excavating the Rose Hip trench across the newly identified Lytle Beach scarp and analyzing evidence from the earlier Vasa Park trench.

In the Rose Hip trench at Lytle Beach, Angster said the team found glacial deposits dating to roughly 15,000 years ago. Above them were lake sediments left behind as ice retreated. The trench also preserved an old layer of soil that formed after the lake dried. “That whole package was folded,” he said. “The only way you could fold those is mostly by a tectonic fault.”

A regional map of the Seattle Fault Zone shows the Lytle Beach and Vasa Park fault scarps, along with the uplifted shore platform associated with the 923 CE earthquake. A new study used mapping, geophysics, trenching, and dating methods to investigate secondary faults within the broader fault zone. Credit: Angster et al., 2026, https://doi.org/10.1130/B38333.1, CC-BY-4.0

The trench record showed evidence of two surface-rupturing earthquakes on the Lytle Beach fault. The older event occurred between 11,240 and 10,430 calibrated years before present, whereas the younger event occurred after 1663 CE, likely in the early nineteenth century. (“Calibrated years before present” refers to dates arrived at via radiocarbon dating, relative to the year 1950 as the “present.”)

“I thought the trenching on Lytle Beach was surprising, that we found two events, because it was such a relatively subtle feature that wasn’t really identified before,” Angster said.

At Vasa Park, the team found evidence of one past earthquake that occurred sometime between 11,380 and 7,400 calibrated years before present. That range overlaps with the older Lytle Beach event and raises the possibility of a longer rupture along the Blakely Harbor fault. However, the evidence in Angster’s study better supports separate ruptures on the two secondary faults.

A Longer Record of Smaller Ruptures

Harold Tobin, an earthquake scientist at the University of Washington who was not involved in the study, called the work “exciting new research.”

He said the study shows there is “room to accommodate smaller earthquakes” that do not reshape shorelines like the 923 or 924 event but are “still big enough to be damaging earthquakes.” The Angster paper, he said, examines “additional earthquakes not accounted for in the shoreline uplift record centered on the 923 or 924 event. These smaller earthquakes may have happened more recently or more often.”

“Subtle features, relatively small or fault traces that we might have ignored before, can be an important part of the story.”

For Tobin, the value also extends beyond Puget Sound. The study “shines a light for other people working in cities and urbanized settings,” he said, because it shows that “subtle features, relatively small or fault traces that we might have ignored before, can be an important part of the story.”

By comparing the dated events at Lytle Beach, Vasa Park, and other secondary faults, the authors estimated that these faults may have ruptured roughly every few hundred years during the late Holocene. Angster cautioned that it’s not quite clockwork. “The secondary faults appear, especially within the last 2,500 years, to rupture more frequently, and that’s where that 350-year interval comes from,” he said. But the estimate rests on a limited record.

Though the work doesn’t forecast the next earthquake, it gives scientists more of the past to weigh as they assess the Puget Lowland. Tobin said the paper “certainly beg[s] more research” because the Seattle Fault Zone contains many strands that still need to be studied. Earthquake hazards should remain “something real” for the public and civil planners.

“We don’t know when they are going to come,” Tobin said. “Obviously, we can go decades without any significant earthquakes, as we have since 2001. But when we least expect it, one will happen, and we just have to be prepared.”

Angster framed the findings more conservatively: “This study doesn’t really change the hazard with the Seattle Fault. It just provides more insight into how it behaves.”

—Jason Collins, Science Writer

Citation: Collins, J. (2026), Small faults add to Seattle’s quake story, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260238. Published on 23 July 2026. Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Scientists Might Have Detected the First Moon Outside Our Solar System… It Just Depends How You Define “Moon.”

Wed, 07/22/2026 - 15:01
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news that impacts science and scientists today.

What exactly is a moon? It’s an existential question lunar researchers found themselves pondering when they discovered an exosatellite at least 90% the size of Jupiter, orbiting a brown dwarf in a system about 73 light-years away from Earth.

 
Related

Depending on how exactly one defines “moon,” the object could be the first moon definitively discovered outside our solar system.

If a moon is a body orbiting another body that is orbiting a star, then yes, we’ve got a moon on our hands. But this exosatellite is orbiting a brown dwarf, a body far larger than most planets but too small to sustain hydrogen fusion as stars do, instead of a planet. And it’s enormous in a way our local moons aren’t.

The whole system is really weird, explained lead author Kevin Hoy in an email to Eos. Hoy is a European Southern Observatory astrophysics Ph.D. student who is also affiliated with the Instituto de Estudios Astrofísicos at the Universidad Diego Portales in Chile and its Millennium Nucleus of Young Exoplanets and their Moons research center.

“The host star is much smaller than the Sun, the brown dwarf is much heavier than our most massive planet, and the satellite is much heavier than any of the moons in our system,” Hoy said. “No part of this system has an obvious comparison to any object in the Solar System.”

The researchers published their findings today in Nature.

When Words Fail

The scientists detected the maybe-moon in the CD-35 2722 system using the radial velocity method, which is often used to detect exoplanets. The brown dwarf moves slightly in response to the exosatellite’s orbit, as the exosatellite exerts a slight gravitational pull. These movements can be seen from Earth as small changes in the brown dwarf’s light spectrum. Scientists observed 26 of these changes from the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile between October 2023 and February 2026.

The scientists ran several models to see what could explain the periodic changes, including a model in which the brown dwarf actually had two exosatellites. The best explanation to fit the data, they found, was one satellite at least 90% as massive as Jupiter orbiting the brown dwarf approximately every 170 days. (The brown dwarf itself is about 37 times as massive as Jupiter, meaning that although the proposed exomoon is huge, it could be proportionally much less massive compared to its primary than the Moon is to Earth.)

The combination of techniques the researchers used were first proposed for detecting exomoons in 2018, in a paper coauthored by Andrew Vanderburg, now an astronomer at Harvard University.

“I never would have imagined that this technique would reveal such an unusual object!” Vandenburg said in an email to Eos. He added that he wondered what exactly the exosatellite was, how it formed, and how big it was. “Regardless, it’s an amazing discovery and I’m super excited to see what else we can find by observing planets like this!”

Researchers have discovered more than 6,200 confirmed exoplanets so far, but only a few candidates for exomoons have been detected, and none have been confirmed. Such a discovery could help us learn more about how various parts of the universe were formed, and how they function today, the paper suggests.

Though it’s possible some unknown variable in the brown dwarf itself could be responsible for the periodic changes in radial velocity the team observed, “we can’t think of any physical mechanism that could reproduce the signal we see,” said Hoy, the lead author of the study. “That’s why we think a satellite is the most likely explanation.”

In this case, the scientists are confident about what they’ve found. They’re just not sure exactly what to call it.

“Perhaps we are approaching the limit of language invented to describe the Solar System, which is entirely unlike CD-35 2722,” the paper reads.

—Emily Gardner, Deputy Editor (@emfurd.bsky.social)

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about science or scientists? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Why Healthy Soils Matter More Than Ever

Wed, 07/22/2026 - 14:19
Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

Protecting soil health is essential to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) since it has direct impacts on food and water security, ecosystem health, and socio-economic activities. However, human-induced drivers and pressures heighten the susceptibility of soils to degradation.

A new article in Reviews of Geophysics explores the drivers, impacts, and efforts to combat soil degradation. Here, we asked the authors to give an overview of soil degradation, practices being implemented to combat it, and what questions remain.

What is soil degradation and why is it important to study?

Soil degradation refers to the deterioration of soil quality resulting from unsustainable human activities most commonly associated with agricultural, pastoral, industrial, and urban land use. It involves a dynamic reduction in the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil that diminishes its structural integrity, functional capacity, and overall resilience over time.

Studying soil degradation is important because it is a major global environmental challenge that threatens soil security, ecosystem services, agricultural productivity, and human well-being. It also makes land more susceptible to droughts, floods, landslides, and climate extremes. Soil degradation often develops gradually and may remain unnoticed until critical thresholds are reached, after which recovery can be extremely slow, costly, or even impossible. Understanding the causes, processes, and consequences of soil degradation is therefore essential for preventing long-term environmental and socio-economic damage and for supporting sustainable land management and ecosystem resilience.

What are the key processes that degrade soil?

The key processes of soil degradation can be grouped into physical, chemical, and biological degradation. Physical degradation includes the breakdown of soil structure, aggregate loss, compaction, reduced porosity and pore connectivity, and erosion caused by water, wind, tillage, or crop harvesting. These processes remove topsoil, nutrients, and organic matter while reducing the capacity of soil to retain water. Chemical degradation includes acidification, alkalization, nutrient depletion or excess nutrient accumulation, loss of soil organic matter and soil organic carbon, salinization, sodicity, and contamination by toxic chemicals or pollutants. Biological degradation involves declines in soil biodiversity, microbial activity, and overall biological functioning. These processes rarely occur independently; rather, they interact and reinforce each other thus increasing the susceptibility of soil to further degradation.

What are the major drivers of soil degradation and how do they differ from perturbations?

The major drivers of soil degradation are long-term natural or anthropogenic forces that initiate or accelerate the physical, chemical, and biological processes of soil degradation. These include deforestation, unsustainable agricultural practices, land-use change, industrial and mining activities, climate change, and overgrazing. These drivers place continuous pressure on the environment and gradually reduce soil functioning. In contrast, perturbations are typically short-term disturbances such as floods, droughts, extreme weather events, wildfires, or sudden land-use changes that temporarily disrupt soil ecosystems and their resilience. The distinction between drivers and perturbations lies primarily in their duration and persistence. When disturbances occur repeatedly or continue over long periods, they can become long-term drivers of degradation.

Drivers and pressures contributing to soil degradation, indicating the complex socio‐economic and environmental interactions that contribute. Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 1

How do scientists measure soil degradation at different spatial scales?

Scientists quantify soil degradation using complementary approaches across multiple spatial scales. At local or field scales, direct surveys and monitoring quantify physical, chemical, and biological indicators of soil health and degradation. These measurements are supported by expert assessments and land-user knowledge gathered from interviews or questionnaires. Analytical frameworks then combine these indicators to evaluate soil functions and ecosystem services under different land management practices. While field observations provide detailed and localized evidence, they are difficult to scale, require repeated monitoring, and depend on context-specific indicator thresholds.

At regional, national, continental, and global scales, assessments combine bottom-up, top-down, and hybrid methods including expert mapping, soil sampling, modeling, and remote sensing. High-resolution satellite imagery and remote sensing technologies enable continuous, large-scale monitoring of land cover, vegetation dynamics, erosion, soil moisture, and other indicators associated with soil degradation. These assessments are increasingly supported by big data analytics, high-performance computing, and advanced machine learning models that integrate diverse datasets and improve the detection and prediction of degradation patterns.

At the microscopic scale, a wide range of experimental and modeling techniques can be employed to characterize the parameters and processes governing the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils, thereby providing insights into the mechanisms that contribute to soil degradation.

What are some of the restoration efforts or practices being implemented to combat soil degradation?

Efforts to restore degraded soils range from large-scale policy initiatives to practical land management strategies. At the national level, restoration projects such as China’s rehabilitation program on the Loess Plateau have successfully restored millions of hectares of degraded land. In Europe, international agreements to reduce transboundary air pollution have decreased acid deposition and promoted the recovery of acidified soils.

Global distribution of improved land management and restoration measures as applied in restoration scenarios (van der Esch et al., 2021). Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 4a

At the field scale, restoration focuses on minimizing further degradation while rebuilding soil health. Reducing vehicle traffic is encouraged to minimize soil disturbance and prevent compaction. Agricultural practices include reduced or no-tillage farming, crop rotation, agroforestry, cover crops, compost and manure application, integrated pest management, and efficient irrigation methods such as drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting. These practices improve soil structure, enhance soil fertility, reduce erosion, increase organic matter, and strengthen the long-term resilience of agricultural soils while supporting sustainable land management.

Why is combating soil degradation essential for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals?

Combating soil degradation is recognized as a fundamental prerequisite for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to the extensive socio-economic and ecological impacts of soil health. Healthy soils provide natural capital and ecosystem service delivery that directly support human well-being. Preventing soil degradation is essential for ensuring global food security, maintaining agricultural productivity, supporting livelihoods, and reducing hunger and poverty. Furthermore, maintaining soil functionality is strictly necessary for preserving water security, regulating the climate, and supporting overall ecosystem health. Consequently, sustainable soil management contributes directly to several SDGs, including SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Failure to combat soil degradation can lead to severe socio-economic consequences such as health crises driven by desert dust storms and widespread human migration, which would completely undermine the environmental resilience demanded by the SDGs.

What are the remaining questions or knowledge gaps where additional research is needed?

Several important knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of soil degradation. One major challenge is the lack of a universally accepted definition of soil degradation. This inconsistency makes it difficult to compare studies and establish standardized indicators and assessment methods. In addition, many global and national assessments are fragmented, outdated, or lack long-term monitoring data.

Global climate simulations help scientists understand how the atmosphere, oceans, and land interact. These high-resolution models improve our ability to study environmental processes and assess how climate may influence soil degradation and ecosystem health. Credit: Shokri et al. [2026], Figure 31

Further research is needed to improve understanding of how multiple drivers interact, how quickly degradation develops, and whether soils can fully recover after pressures are removed. Scientists also need a better understanding of the links between climate, land use, and soil processes, as well as the socio-economic impacts on livelihoods, inequality, and migration. Improving monitoring methods, data sharing, and standardized protocols will help produce more reliable assessments and support more effective soil management and restoration strategies.

—Nima Shokri (nima.shokri@tuhh.de, 0000-0001-6799-4888), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany; Mehdi Afshar (0000-0002-4411-3299), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany; and Milad Aminzadeh (0000-0002-0074-3600), Institute of Geo-Hydroinformatics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany

Editor’s Note: It is the policy of AGU Publications to invite the authors of articles published in Reviews of Geophysics to write a summary for Eos Editors’ Vox.

Citation: Shokri, N., M. Afshar, and M. Aminzadeh (2026), Why healthy soils matter more than ever, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO265026. Published on 22 July 2026. This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s). Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Might Make Flights Smoother

Wed, 07/22/2026 - 13:14
https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/eos-activities.html?url=EOSURL

Stomach-churning dips and swerves can be the most unpleasant—and dangerous—part of flying. To travelers’ chagrin, climate change has already begun to make such aircraft turbulence more common, as it alters the movement of air masses at the heights where planes fly.

Researchers wondered whether stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a controversial climate intervention strategy to cool the planet by injecting sunlight-blocking aerosols into the stratosphere, could help. In a study published last month in Environmental Research Letters, a team modeled aircraft turbulence under future climates with and without SAI. The researchers found that climate intervention could, indeed, reduce aircraft turbulence, even below modern-day levels.

“SAI is very important, but on the other hand, it’s very dangerous,” said study author Hye-Yeong Chun, an atmospheric scientist at Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea. “These results show that aviation turbulence is quite significantly reduced [with SAI]—so this is one merit, at least, on the SAI side.”

A Bumpy Future

Climate change isn’t warming the planet evenly; the poles are heating up faster than the equator. This imbalance shrinks the temperature difference between the rising masses of cool and warm air that meet to form the jet stream, a fast-moving current of air that swirls like a river around the globe near 9,100 meters (30,000 feet) in elevation. The lower temperature difference weakens the jet stream, making it wavier and prone to wind shear, or changes in wind speed or direction over short distances. Because wind shear is one of the primary causes of aircraft turbulence, plane rides are getting bumpier, explained Chun.

“[Turbulence is] a very intermittent and localized phenomenon. Even current weather forecasting models and high-resolution numerical models cannot directly predict turbulence.”

But turbulence is also one of the trickiest weather elements to predict, she said. Unlike turbulence from storms or clouds, which is visible and easier to forecast, so-called clear-air turbulence can’t be seen by pilots. “It’s a very intermittent and localized phenomenon,” said Chun. “Even current weather forecasting models and high-resolution numerical models cannot directly predict turbulence.”

Understanding turbulence and how the jet stream is changing is important “not only for comforting people, but also for reduction of greenhouse emissions,” said Tommaso Alberti, a physicist at Italy’s Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia who was not involved with the study. Turbulence can increase a plane’s fuel requirements as it readjusts, while taking advantage of a strong jet stream can shrink flight times and associated carbon emissions.

Since the phenomenon can’t be directly predicted, scientists like Chun use proxies—other measurements that indicate potential regions where turbulence might occur. In the new study, she and her colleagues used a measure called the Ellrod index, which combines data on vertical wind shear and the stretchiness of masses of air.

The researchers modeled how the Ellrod index would change across seven climate futures with varying amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, three of which had no human intervention and four of which had SAI. They found that although climate change should increase aircraft turbulence across nearly all latitudes, SAI could reduce such increases by up to 60%. And to Chun’s surprise, SAI was powerful enough not only to counteract future turbulence but also to reverse modern-day levels of climate-driven turbulence. One possible explanation is that depending on where the aerosols get injected, SAI cools the tropics more strongly than the poles, counteracting the shrinking temperature difference that forces the jet stream out of balance.

Global Tactics, Global Implications

“We have to find the optimal way to reduce temperature but, on the other hand, reduce any potential side effects.”

Though the study results are promising, they are far from a green light to conduct climate intervention, said Chun. Still, the goal set forth in the Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 2°C above preindustrial levels will not be easy to achieve, she said. “We have to find the optimal way to reduce temperature but, on the other hand, reduce any potential side effects.”

With global climate interventions such as SAI, a top concern is that any side effects will occur throughout the world, ranging from changes in rainfall to disruptions to the ozone layer. The most commonly proposed aerosol, sulfur dioxide, can also cause acid rain as it falls out of the atmosphere.

Ramalingam Saravanan, an atmospheric scientist at Texas A&M University who was not involved with the study, said that researching SAI in “controlled and safe conditions” had its merits. But as a longtime modeler, he said, “There are all kinds of errors in models that we are still working with…saying ‘This is what will happen’ in a model may not exactly be what will happen in the real world.”

In turn, Saravanan worried that private individuals or companies pushing to enact climate intervention might overstate the benefits to airplane turbulence. “Focusing on potential modest benefits of a radical and uncertain mitigation approach, as this study does, risks deflecting attention away from the inherently large dangers of climate intervention,” he clarified in an email.

Alberti noted that artificial intelligence models may eventually be able to forecast clear-air turbulence, providing a less risky solution for dealing with the hazard. However, he noted that would only be a way to adapt to climate-driven turbulence, not mitigate it.

Chun said that she was not yet advocating for the actual implementation of SAI but that researching it is critical if global leaders are to consider such a strategy. AGU’s Ethical Framework Principles for Climate Intervention Research acknowledges that such geoengineering approaches shouldn’t move forward without an internationally agreed-upon ethical governance structure but states that “more knowledge about climate intervention approaches and their consequences will help society make informed, just decisions about the deployment of climate intervention.”

“The risk is quite significant,” Chun said. “Scientists have to work very hard to save lives, to save our planet.”

—Hannah Richter (@hannah-richter.bsky.social), Science Writer

This news article is included in our ENGAGE resource for educators seeking science news for their classroom lessons. Browse all ENGAGE articles, and share with your fellow educators how you integrated the article into an activity in the comments section below.

Citation: Richter, H. (2026), Stratospheric aerosol injection might make flights smoother, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260237. Published on 22 July 2026. Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Redesigning Farmland Through Community Collaboration in California

Wed, 07/22/2026 - 12:00
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Community Science

California is experiencing major changes in how farmland is used as recent policies seek to protect groundwater resources. These changes are reshaping both the landscape and the lives of rural residents, especially in communities like Fairmead in Madera County, which is surrounded by water-intensive almond orchards.

In Community Science’s special collection on Transdisciplinary Collaboration for Sustainable Agriculture, Katrak-Adefowora et al. [2026] describe a project that engaged Fairmead residents and farmers in redesigning a small almond farm into a landscape that reflects multiple community priorities. The new landscape includes a basin that captures stormwater to reduce flooding and help replenish groundwater, native plants that improve habitat, and a walking path for community recreational use. Community members and farmers were engaged through workshops, outreach, and educational activities, with the project team remaining flexible and responsive to local input.

This paper shows how involving communities in landscape decisions from the beginning can lead to solutions that are both environmentally beneficial and responsive to local priorities. It also offers a practical collaborative model for other regions facing similar land-use and water challenges, demonstrating how partnerships among residents, farmers, nonprofits, businesses, local governments, and scientists can support more resilient communities.

Citation: Katrak-Adefowora, R., Massell, A., Ortiz, V., Vizcarra, A., Nelson, B., & Fernandez-Bou, A. S. (2026). Community-driven solutions for groundwater resilience in California. Community Science,5, e2025CSJ000167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025CSJ000167

—Claire F. Beveridge, Editor, Community Science Exchange

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Fatal landslides in May 2026

Wed, 07/22/2026 - 05:57

In May 2026 I recorded 51 fatal landslides causing 185 fatalities. 2026 is proving to be atypical in terms of the temporal pattern of fatal landslides.

This is my regular update for the number of fatal global landslides, focusing on May 2026. As usual, this data has been collected in line with the methodology described in Froude and Petley (2018) and in Petley (2012). References are listed below – please cite these articles if you use this analysis. Data presented in these updates should be treated as being provisional at this stage as I will reanalyse them prior to formal publication, and other events will emerge.

Note that this data excludes landslides triggered by earthquakes (see below).

The headline figures are as follows:

May 2026: 51 fatal landslides causing 185 fatalities.

This is the monthly number of landslides by month in 2026 to the end of May:-

The number of global fatal landslides in 2026 by month to the end of May.

Last month I noted that 2026 was proving to be atypical in terms of the pattern of fatal landslides. This has continued through May, with the total number recorded in this month being lower than for both February and March. This may indicate that patterns of rainfall this year are different from the norm. More research is needed.

My preferred way of presenting this data us to use the cumulative total by pentad. This graph is to pentad 30, which ends on 30 May:-

The cumulative total number of global fatal landslides in 2026 by pentad to the end of May.

So, to 30 May 2026 the cumulative total number of fatal landslides was very significantly higher than the long term mean and above the exceptional year of 2024. However, note that the cumulative total was very close to the 2024 total – this year did not experience the early acceleration in the rate of cumulative landslides that we saw in 2024.

As always the final annual total will heavily depend upon rainfall patterns in East and South Asia in the northern hemisphere summer months.

Major events included the multiple landslides in Yongchuan, Chongqing, China on 24 May.

The 8 June 2026 M=7.8 earthquake in the Philippines also triggered landslides – to date I have recorded six separate events causing 31 fatalities, but this may be incomplete.

I am now working on the June 2026 data.

References

Froude, M. and Petley, D.N. 2018.  Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016.  Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 18, 2161-2181.

Petley, D.N. 2012. Global patterns of loss of life from landslidesGeology 40 (10), 927-930.

Return to The Landslide Blog homepage Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Slums Are Bearing the Brunt of the Climate Crisis—And Devising Solutions

Tue, 07/21/2026 - 13:11

This story was originally published by Knowable Magazine.

Reporting for this story was supported by the Pulitzer Center.

Since moving into a public housing project in Mumbai nearly 20 years ago, Parveen Shaikh has grown familiar with the ravages of extreme heat. She has acquired a new vocabulary, adding terms like “low blood pressure”—which she has learned is a consequence of blood vessels dilating to keep the body cool and causes dizziness, vomiting and irritability. “Little kids,” she observes, “get angry faster than they used to.”

Shaikh doesn’t remember low blood pressure being a problem when she was growing up in poverty on the city’s sidewalks, though there were plenty of others. It was a victory of sorts when she moved into her home as part of a government relocation program. But as India’s seasons have become less predictable, and its hot periods hotter, the flaws in the housing project’s construction have become apparent.

There isn’t much space between the tenements here, and many apartments lack natural light and ventilation. The heat, when it arrives, is inescapable, as are its physiological consequences. On the day in late January when I met Shaikh, summer was more than a month away, but a team of medics was already testing people’s blood pressure in the shade of a residential block.

Heat is now a major and growing problem across the Global South. Under the highest emissions trajectory, rising temperatures will cause an additional 6 million deaths per year by 2100, according to estimates from the University of Chicago’s Climate Impact Lab. That’s comparable to today’s annual deaths from infectious diseases. The vast majority of those deaths will happen in the poorest countries, where the most vulnerable of all are those who live or work informally—those who make their homes in slums or on the street, or who are employed in the gig economy.

Indeed, climate change “is already profoundly affecting the lives of poor people worldwide—A, because they live in places that are already hot, and B, because they are not able to protect themselves as well,” the Nobel Prize-winning economist Esther Duflo of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Collège de France told me at the Jaipur Literature Festival in India in January.

Duflo, coauthor of the book Poor Economics, whose second edition addresses climate change, sees a vicious cycle at work: Climate change pushes more and more people off the land as that land becomes increasingly uncultivable, and exposes them to a new set of risks in the cities to which they gravitate.

“There is no way to think about how to cope with climate change that doesn’t put the poor at the very center of the conversation,” Duflo says.

So far that conversation has ignored the poor, with the result that cities are ill prepared to undertake the massive infrastructure projects needed to accommodate an accelerating influx of people, says Duflo. That’s especially true in the Global South, which is the fastest urbanizing region and where most of the growth is informal—meaning that it is uncoordinated and happening outside of any legal framework. But it won’t be long before all urbanites—who already account for more than half of humanity—feel the strain.

Yet precisely because it has been the first to inhabit the climate crisis, the Global South has also been generating the first, albeit ad hoc, solutions. Heat, flooding and a surge in infectious diseases are forcing the poor, in particular, to be creative to survive. They are finding ways to keep cool and dry, building resilience from the bottom up—largely without the help of official institutions.

It’s a piecemeal resilience for now, but others are learning from their solutions, and in some cases scaling them up. Researchers are even realizing that despite being marginalized, informal settlements may have structural advantages over formal ones, since many of them combine high density and strong social and economic networks with a relatively small carbon footprint.

A new ethos is emerging—that informal urban growth may not just be inevitable but also may hold lessons in resilience for the cities of the future.

Mapping Heat and Health

Slums were long shown as “blank spots” on the world’s maps, UN-Habitat noted in 2003. Partly due to satellite and drone technology, and partly thanks to efforts by informal communities to map themselves, that is no longer true.

As the informal city swam into view, so did the negative effects of climate change on the urban poor. Now researchers are systematically studying those effects, to understand which solutions will bring the greatest benefits.

For example, in an ongoing study run by Indian grassroots organizations in collaboration with Harvard University, female tenant farmers and piece-rate workers received Fitbits to wear, and environmental sensors were fitted in their homes and workplaces to monitor the heat and humidity there. They showed that these people literally have no place to hide.

At the peak of summer, those who work outside, which is the majority, are exposed to near-intolerable temperatures—35° Celsius (95° Fahrenheit) and higher. “Even the water gets so hot that we feel that we are having tea,” said Subhiben, a study participant from Gujarat who works raking brine in the region’s enormous salt flats. And often, the sensor data show, the heat doesn’t let up when they return home.

Among the negative health outcomes that these women report are cardiac stress, gynecological problems including miscarriage, and mental health issues, says Sahil Hebbar, a doctor with the Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA) in the Gujarati city of Ahmedabad and one of the coordinators of the study.

The research is revealing unsuspected interactions too, including between heat and malnutrition. According to Hebbar, up to half of SEWA’s members suffer from anemia, which can be caused by iron deficiency. That anemia correlates with much poorer cardiovascular outcomes in response to extreme heat, according to an as-yet unpublished finding of the study.

Other researchers are documenting the infectious diseases spreading in informal settlements, helped along by crowding and inadequate ventilation. Tuberculosis remains endemic in India where, according to the World Health Organization, two deaths from TB occur every three minutes. It is a major problem at Shaikh’s housing project, as it is at many others across the country.

The situation is reminiscent of the disease-ridden slums of New York, London and other northern cities in the early 20th century, except that today the disease is preventable. “We have the tools to diagnose and treat 100 percent of people with TB,” says Guy Marks, a respiratory physician at the University of New South Wales in Sydney and president of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

Cholera and other waterborne diseases typically surge in the wake of floods, and a 2025 study showed that one in three informal settlers in the Global South live in floodplains and are at risk of a “disastrous flood.” But such diseases are now a problem outside of floods, too. Meanwhile, vector-borne diseases, such as those carried by mosquitoes, are on the rise. Health geographer Olivier Telle of the CNRS in Paris reports that dengue, which is transmitted by the Aedes aegypti mosquitois thriving in informal settlements where heat is increasing and people stock water because they don’t have access to a running source—providing ideal conditions for mosquitoes to breed.

And rather than staying in these settlements, which are often on the edges of cities, dengue is creeping toward the city centers, following human mobility and employment opportunities. Telle’s team found that in Delhi, for example, the wealthiest neighborhoods had an incidence of dengue similar to impoverished ones, probably because more infected people from the periphery worked there. “You need to protect the least well-off to protect the community as a whole,” Telle says.

Cooling Begins at Home

As data on climate-driven health problems accumulate, researchers are beginning to discern which grassroots solutions are most protective. One of the most effective ways to protect workers from extreme heat is to ensure that they can keep their homes cool, the India-Harvard study found. Simply painting a roof with white reflective paint, for example, can reduce indoor temperatures in summer by around 2° Celsius. Since WHO estimates that more than half of the urban housing stock that India will need by 2070 has yet to be built, Hebbar hopes that such simple fixes will feed into that future formal development, producing more climate-adapted homes and workplaces.

Others are thinking along similar lines. Mumbai-based Sheela Patel, former chair of the grassroots federation Slum Dwellers International, is leading a project called Roof Over Our Heads (ROOH) in which slum dwellers—mainly women—collaborate with architects and engineers to build climate-resilient, affordable homes. One ROOH house I visited under construction in Mumbai had floor tiles made of plastic collected by informal garbage collectors and recycled. It was about to receive a roof of pre-painted galvanized iron sheeting, which reflects heat.

To date ROOH has built around 250 houses in a dozen countries, and Patel’s hope is that seeing these, other slum dwellers will borrow elements or copy them entirely. The project’s aim is to bring together broadly applicable solutions in a single place, eventually a web-based platform, so that people all over the Global South can access them and adapt them as needed. For her, it’s critical that the solutions come from the people closest to the problem, so that when the authorities finally decide to act, those solutions—tried and tested—will be waiting for them.

Others are devising plans for retrofitting whole settlements to make them more climate-resilient—the kind of solution that needs to be implemented top down, by city or state authorities. In Nairobi, Kenya, for example, a low-cost scheme to connect residents of the informal settlement Mukuru to the city’s sewage system has been put in place. This “simplified sewer,” which uses smaller pipes and shallower excavation, has already led to a significant drop in cholera , even though it’s only partially complete.

Such in situ upgrading is generally considered the gold standard for improving slums, because inhabitants stay put and their social and economic connections are preserved. But it isn’t always possible, according to urbanist José Núñez Collado of Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. For some informal settlements, relocation of the entire community is the best or only option—and that will be true more often, he says, as the climate crisis intensifies.

For now, such relocations tend to happen without much consultation with the inhabitants. This was the case, for example, with La Barquita—a flood-prone informal settlement in Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic, whose inhabitants were relocated to a social housing project in 2016. Collado’s decade-long study of that relocated community shows that they feel more secure in their new home, La Nueva Barquita, but that many people have either lost their jobs or must now travel farther to work.

Projects like India’s ROOH are attempts to stimulate a more collaborative approach to improving informal settlements—one that combines bottom-up and top-down initiatives, taking account of the needs and expertise of their inhabitants. For ROOH’s Patel, such an approach is long overdue. “We believe that extreme weather is going to impact 2 billion people living informally in the future, a quarter of the global population,” she says. “No government, no industry, is looking at this.”

What is clear is that the informal city can’t be eliminated. As more data accrue, researchers like complex systems scientist and urbanist Luís Bettencourt of the University of Chicago are using it to show that informal settlements emerge in fast-growing cities as a bottom-up measure by which people build housing in the absence of adequate supply. “They provide a pathway to development,” he says.

Given this, Bettencourt thinks that governments should be working with the urban poor, not only to retrofit informal settlements, but also to plan prospectively—making sure that future cities are fit for habitation, and not just by the rich. His research, which builds on half a century of efforts by informal communities to map and survey themselves, has revealed one principle that he feels should guide all future policy. He distills it into two words: “Informal’s normal.”

—Laura Spinney (@laurainparis.bsky.social) Knowable Magazine

This article originally appeared in Knowable Magazine, a nonprofit publication dedicated to making scientific knowledge accessible to all. Sign up for Knowable Magazine’s newsletter.

Read the original article here.

太阳风暴如何影响地球天气?一项新研究探讨其作用机制

Tue, 07/21/2026 - 13:10
Source: Geophysical Research Letters

This is an authorized translation of an Eos article. 本文是Eos文章的授权翻译。

影响地球气候和天气模式的因素多种多样,从人为温室气体排放到火山活动,再到太阳活动的变化,不一而足。

随着太阳经历短期和长期的活动变化,包括众所周知的11年太阳黑子周期,太阳向地球大气层输送着不同量的总太阳能量。大量证据表明,太阳活动的长期变化与降雨量、地表温度和其他气候指标的变化之间存在相关性。然而,这些大气变量相互交织,难以辨别其背后的物理机制。

Raeder 报告了首个明确的证据,表明地磁暴,即由太阳活动爆发引起的持续数小时的地球磁层扰动,会影响地球上的天气状况。这些发现有助于科学家缩小太阳活动变化影响天气的可能机制范围。

该分析整合了67年来北美地区逐小时记录的地磁暴强度数据,以及同期逐小时记录的大气数据。后者的数据集得益于大气建模技术的进步,是近期才得以获取的。

数据显示,地磁暴会在数小时到数天内显著影响大气压力、温度和降水。地磁暴的强度似乎与其大气影响的严重程度密切相关。此外,这些影响还会因地区和季节而异。例如,冬季地磁暴似乎会提升美国西海岸的气温,而美国其他大部分地区的气温则会下降。

这些发现与先前提出的一些潜在机制吻合良好,但与其他一些机制则存在较大差异。他们排除了被称为宇宙射线云假说的机制,但总体上支持自上而下的机制,即从高层大气传播到对流层,而对流层正是我们大部分天气现象发生的区域。

基于这项分析,作者认为,先前观测到的太阳活动与地球天气之间的长期相关性,很可能是由类似本研究中分析的太阳风暴等短暂的太阳活动爆发造成的,而非缓慢的持续变化。

这项研究还可以为天气和气候模型的更新提供参考,目前这些模型在准确捕捉地磁暴对地球大气层的影响方面仍存在困难。

—科学撰稿人Sarah Stanley

This translation was made by Wiley. 本文翻译由Wiley提供。

Read this article on WeChat. 在微信上分享本文。

Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Southeast Tibet Grew in Pulses, Not All at Once

Tue, 07/21/2026 - 12:47
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Tectonics

The gently sloping southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau preserves an important record of when and how the plateau expanded, yet its growth history remains contentious. By dating the cooling histories of minerals from the northern Jinsha River fold-and-thrust belt (a region where rock layers were compressed, folded, and thrust over one another), Shen et al. [2026] identify three episodes of accelerated exhumation, when tectonic uplift and surface erosion brought deeply buried rocks toward the surface: approximately 80–68 million years ago, 38–34 million years ago, and from about 19 million years ago to the present.

The oldest episode coincided with sediment accumulation in the adjacent Gonjo Basin, linking early mountain building to sedimentary basin development. The second episode records renewed compression along the Jinsha suture, a former tectonic plate boundary, and forms part of a broader southeastward propagation of crustal shortening across northern Southeast Tibet. The youngest episode primarily reflects incision by the Jinsha River, although continued fault activity may also have contributed to exhumation. Together, these results indicate that Southeast Tibet grew through multiple tectonic pulses over the past ~80 million years, rather than predominantly during a single phase driven by the southeastward flow of weak lower-crustal rock and consequent surface uplift.

Citation: Shen, X., Liu-Zeng, J., Shen, X., van der Beek, P., Cao, K., Xing, Y., & Zeng, X. (2026). Multi-stage tectonic growth of Southeast Tibet since the late cretaceous: Insights from the Jinsha suture zone in the three rivers region. Tectonics, 45, e2025TC009246. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025TC009246

—Djordje Grujic, Editor, Tectonics

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Making Weather and Climate Information Reach the Communities that Need It

Mon, 07/20/2026 - 19:29
Editors’ Highlights are summaries of recent papers by AGU’s journal editors. Source: Community Science 

Information about the weather is crucial for life, property, and work. Many people take it for granted. Yet, despite the centuries of sharing such information, especially when it is critical to provide warning, it does not reach all communities. There are many communities for which barriers of language, access, and trust lead to underutilization of information.

Sharma et al. [2026] address this challenge by considering how to design the information sharing process so it can get to the hard-to-reach communities. The study identifies where the information gets lost in translation. Considering this, the authors propose practical approaches to help ensure that all people, regardless of their location, language, or connectivity, can receive the information they need to prepare for and respond to high-impact weather events. This includes providing specific resources and staff that are dedicated to sharing this information with these communities. The study emphasizes the importance of designing information sharing processes that don’t assume that people will find the information—especially the most vulnerable.  

Citation: Sharma, S., Were, V., Farris, A., Joshi, A., Gerst, M. D., Sund, I., & Kenney, M. A. (2026). Information supply chain gaps for hard-to-reach communities: A solution-oriented framework from weather service insights. Community Science, 5, e2025CSJ000160. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025CSJ000160

—Muki Haklay, Editor, Community Science Exchange

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer