Feed aggregator

Climatic controls on erosional efficiency vary with lithology across the Himalaya

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Kevin Shao, Seulgi Moon, Gen K. Li, Peter J. Haproff, An Yin, Lee B. Corbett, Paul R. Bierman, Marina O. Argueta, Alan J. Hidy

Insights into the 3D structure and behaviour of Icelandic crystal mushes from gabbroic nodules

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Rahul Subbaraman, Margaret E. Hartley, Jonathan Fellowes, Margherita Polacci, Barbara Bonechi, Lucia Pappalardo, Gianmarco Buono, David A. Neave

From seal to pathway: carbonate veins reveal fluid flow in the clay-rich strike-slip Yangsan Fault, South Korea

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Luca Smeraglia, Youngbeom Cheon, Chang-Min Kim, Andrea Billi, Chiara Boschi, Ilaria Baneschi, Stefano M. Bernasconi, Andrea Fiorini, Eugenio Carminati

Strain rate concentration along the Niigata-Kobe tectonic zone, central Japan as explained by 2D collision numerical models with visco-elasto-plastic rheology

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Erika J. Moreno, Shoichi Yoshioka, Vlad C. Manea, Marina Manea, Nobuaki Suenaga

Organic carbon burial and ocean redox modulated biotic recovery after the latest Ordovician crisis

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Wei Tang, Mu Liu, Heng-Ye Wei, Li-Guang Wu, Kai Lu, Jian Wang, Xian-Hua Li

Axial-valley floor faults tell a different story than faults outside the axial valley: the role of dike-induced deformation

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Jie Chen, Masako Tominaga, Javier Escartín

Eoarchean TTG formation via melt-solid interaction at the base of the Tanzania Craton inferred from multi-proxy detrital zircon data

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Robert Bolhar, Axel Hofmann, Balz S. Kamber, Martin J. Whitehouse, Roland Maas, Jeffrey D. Vervoort, Heejin Jeon, Manuela Botero, Joas Kabete

Mantle flow and deformation of the eastern Adria subduction: New insights from AdriaArray seismic anisotropy

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Laura Petrescu, Felix Borleanu, Samuel Celis, Dániel Kalmár, the AdriaArray Seismology Group

Residual mass-independently fractionated oxygen present in solids accreted during planetesimal formation in the early Solar System: potential evidence from main group pallasites

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Martin F. Miller

Sediment provenance and transport pathways along the Atlantic Iberian Margin

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Sara Campderrós, Leopoldo D. Pena, Ester Garcia-Solsona, Eduardo Paredes-Paredes, Albert Català, Jaime Frigola, Negar Haghipour, Isabel Cacho

<em>In-situ</em> U-Pb dating of early marine carbonate cements constrains the age of the late Ediacaran lower Nama Group, Namibia

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Mariana A. Yilales, Nick MW Roberts, Collen-Issia Uahengo, Nathan Rochelle-Bates, Fred Bowyer, Rachel Wood

Changing volatile emissions and sources along the Ethiopian Rift

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Abate A. Melaku, Gemechu B. Teferi, Takele Mihretie, Snorri Gudbrandsson, Yared Sinetebeb, Peter H. Barry, Tobias P. Fischer, Finlay M. Stuart, Ugur Balci, Sæmundur A. Halldórsson, Chris J. Ballentine, Darren J. Hillegonds, Emma L. Chambers, Derek Keir, Richard Bates, William Hutchison

Coral reef terrace age deduced from retreating knickpoints

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Yiran Wang, Aron J. Meltzner, Michael E. Oskin, Jennifer Quye-Sawyer, Lin Thu Aung, Noelynna Ramos

Isotope effects (Cl, O, C) of heterogeneous electrochemistry induced by Martian dust activities

Earth and Planetary Science Letters - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:11

Publication date: 15 February 2026

Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 676

Author(s): Neil C. Sturchio, Hao Yan, Alian Wang, W. Andrew Jackson, Huiming Bao, Chuck Y.C. Yan, Linnea J. Heraty, Yu Wei, Quincy H.K. Qu, Kevin S. Olsen

Tree bark microbes also clean the air by removing greenhouse and toxic gases

Phys.org: Earth science - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 19:00
Australian researchers have discovered a hidden climate superpower of trees. Their bark harbors trillions of microbes that help scrub the air of greenhouse and toxic gases.

Plan to End NEPA’s “Regulatory Reign of Terror” Is Finalized

EOS - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 18:37
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news regarding law and policy changes that impact science and scientists today.

The Trump administration has finalized a plan to roll back regulations outlined by one of the nation’s bedrock environmental laws.

Signed into law in 1970, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to assess how proposed major projects—such as the purchase of parklands, the establishment of military complexes, or the construction of buildings and highways—will impact the environment.

NEPA opponents, which include both Republicans and Democrats, claim the processes outlined in the legislation unnecessarily delay approvals for infrastructure and energy projects. Last February, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published an interim final rule removing NEPA regulations. The new action adopts the rule as final.

 
Related

“In this Administration, NEPA’s regulatory reign of terror has ended,” said CEQ Chairman Katherine Scarlett in a statement. “Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, CEQ acted early to slash needless layering of bureaucratic burden and restore common sense to the environmental review and permitting process.”

In response to the interim final rule, the CEQ received more than 108,000 public comments, according to a document outlining the rule published today on the Federal Register. One such comment came from a coalition of environmental groups, expressing strong opposition to the rule last March.

NEPA “promotes sound and environmentally-informed decisionmaking by federal agencies, and it provides the primary way for the public to learn about and provide input regarding the impacts of federal actions on their lives,” the letter read. “The only certainty provided by the Interim Final Rule is less government transparency, more project delay, more litigation, less resilient infrastructure, and poor environmental and health outcomes for communities.”

—Emily Gardner (@emfurd.bsky.social), Associate Editor

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about how changes in law or policy are affecting scientists or research? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

The western US is in a snow drought. Here's how a storm made it worse

Phys.org: Earth science - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 17:19
Much of the western U.S. has started in 2026 in the midst of a snow drought. That might sound surprising, given the record precipitation from atmospheric rivers hitting the region in recent weeks, but those storms were actually part of the problem.

Greenland is rich in natural resources. A geologist explains why

Phys.org: Earth science - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 17:06
Greenland, the largest island on Earth, possesses some of the richest stores of natural resources anywhere in the world.

AI improves flood projections under climate change

Phys.org: Earth science - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 16:59
When engineers and planners design roads, bridges and dams, they rely on hydrological models intended to protect infrastructure and communities from 50- and 100-year floods. But as climate change increases the frequency and severity of floods, existing models are becoming less and less reliable, new Cornell research finds.

Trump Pulls United States Out of International Climate Efforts “Contrary” to National Interests

EOS - Thu, 01/08/2026 - 16:11
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news regarding law and policy changes that impact science and scientists today.

In an executive order issued on 7 January, the White House ordered the country’s withdrawal from 66 international agreements determined to be “contrary to the interests of the United States,” including two global efforts to combat climate change: the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The UNFCCC is a 1992 treaty that sets the legal framework for international cooperation to limit climate change. The IPCC is the United Nations organization that assesses and communicates climate science to global governments. 

The order will make the United States the only country in the world that does not participate in the UNFCCC.

 “As the only country in the world not a part of the UNFCCC treaty, the Trump administration is throwing away decades of U.S. climate change leadership and global collaboration.” 

“This is a shortsighted, embarrassing, and foolish decision,” Gina McCarthy, former EPA administrator under President Barack Obama, told E&E News. “As the only country in the world not a part of the UNFCCC treaty, the Trump administration is throwing away decades of U.S. climate change leadership and global collaboration.” 

McCarthy added that the U.S. withdrawal would limit the country’s ability to influence important decisions that impact the global economy, especially as other countries invest heavily in clean energy.

KD Chavez, executive director of the Climate Justice Alliance, an advocacy organization, said in a statement that the withdrawal “protects polluters while abandoning all of us, our livelihoods, and Mother Earth.”

“This move undermines treaty obligations, tribal sovereignty, and the global cooperation needed to survive the climate crisis,” Chavez said.

Others say the UFCCC is ineffective, and that leaving it could open new opportunities to cooperate with other countries to combat or mitigate climate change: “The framework convention is a joke,” George David Banks, Trump’s international climate adviser during his first term, told E&E News.

The UNFCCC has been criticized in the past for the ineffectiveness of its annual “conferences of the parties,” or COPs, as well as the influence of fossil fuel lobbyists at these meetings. 

 
Related

Because the Senate originally, and unanimously, advised President George H.W. Bush to join the UNFCCC in 1992, legal experts question whether the order to withdraw is constitutional, or whether the United States could rejoin in the future. 

The withdrawal from the IPCC also cuts the United States out of global climate science assessments. “Walking away doesn’t make the science disappear, it only leaves people across the United States, policymakers, and businesses flying in the dark at the very moment when credible climate information is most urgently needed,” Delta Merner, associate accountability campaign director for the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement

On his first day in office last year, Trump pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement, a legally binding treaty setting long-term emissions goals, for a second time—an action that one United Nations report estimated would eliminate 0.1°C (0.18°F) of global progress on climate change by 2100. Withdrawing from the IPCC and UNFCCC leaves the United States further isolated from international cooperative efforts to limit climate change.

—Grace van Deelen (@gvd.bsky.social), Staff Writer

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about how changes in law or policy are affecting scientists or research? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer