Feed aggregator

Prescribed performance rapid attitude maneuvering control based on time delay estimation for flexible spacecraft system with input deadzone

Publication date: 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 75, Issue 8

Author(s): Junjun Liu, Yufu Cui, Haoping Wang, Xingyu Zhou, Linghui Yu

Along-track orbit error of geostationary GNSS satellites

Publication date: 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 75, Issue 8

Author(s): Kyohei Akiyama, Oliver Montenbruck

Permafrost destabilization induced hazard mapping in Himalayas using machine learning methods

Publication date: 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 75, Issue 8

Author(s): Arvind Chandra Pandey, Anikul Islam, Bikash Ranjan Parida, Chandra Shekhar Dwivedi

CSIA: Climate structures inpainting augmentations for multispectral remote sensing imagery segmentation

Publication date: 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research, Volume 75, Issue 8

Author(s): Nikita V. Belyakov, Svetlana Illarionova

Round-robin test of SIP laboratory measurements using electrical test networks

Geophysical Journal International - Sat, 04/26/2025 - 00:00
SummaryThis study presents the results of an interlaboratory test designed to evaluate the accuracy of Spectral Induced Polarization (SIP) measurements using controlled electrical test networks. The study, conducted in Germany since 2006, involved 12 research institutes, six different impedance measurement devices, and four types of electrical test networks specifically designed to evaluate phase shift errors in SIP measurements. The test networks, with impedances ranging from 100 kΩ to 150 kΩ, represent high-impedance samples with different phase characteristics, and pose the measurement challenges typical of such samples, including high contact impedances and parasitic capacitances. Four key findings emerged from the study: (1) Impedance measurements across all devices showed deviations within 1% over a wide frequency range (0.001 Hz - 1000 Hz); (2) phase errors remained below 1 mrad up to 100 Hz for most devices, but increased at higher frequencies due to parasitic capacitances and electromagnetic coupling effects; (3) lab-specific instruments have lower phase errors than field instruments when used in a laboratory environment, primarily due to the effects of long cables and too low input impedances of the field instruments; and (4) short cables and driven shielding technology effectively minimized parasitic capacitance and improved measurement accuracy. The study highlights the usefulness of test networks in assessing the accuracy of SIP measurements and raises awareness of the various factors influencing the quality of SIP data.

Energy Amplification of Repeated Radiating Ultrasonic Pulse Signals Transmitted Through Gas-bearing Sands: Potential for Gas Bubble Manipulation

Geophysical Journal International - Sat, 04/26/2025 - 00:00
SummaryGas-bearing sediments in shallow-water environments have recently attracted attention from the perspectives of energy resources, potential geohazards, and climate change. Our laboratory measurements demonstrate the potential for gas-bubble manipulation in gas-bearing sands via radiating repeated pulse signals. By monitoring the temporal changes in the waveform of repeated ultrasonic pulse irradiation with a dominant frequency of 100 kHz transmitted through gas-bearing sand, we observe energy amplification and a frequency shift toward the dominant frequency in the recorded waveforms over 880 h. These results imply that gas bubbles may deform or move autonomously to propagate irradiated ultrasonic waves most efficiently and thereby minimize the energy loss of the transmitted waves. Gas bubbles larger than sand grains detected using three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography cannot explain the phenomena of energy amplification and frequency shifts, indicating the need for a higher spatial resolution to capture the behavior of smaller gas bubbles.

Airborne Natural Source Electromagnetics for an Arbitrary Base Station

Geophysical Journal International - Sat, 04/26/2025 - 00:00
SummaryAirborne magnetotelluric (AirMT) systems generate transfer function data from magnetic fields measured in the air and either electric or magnetic fields measured at a base station. AirMT anomalies are fundamentally controlled by the anomalous magnetic fields within the survey region. While AirMT data acquired using a magnetic field base station are not directly sensitive to the conductivity at the base station, AirMT data acquired using an electric field base station are scaled by the inverse square root of the conductivity at the base station. The transfer function data collected by various AirMT systems have different sensitivity functions. Consequently, the inversion of AirMT data for different acquisition systems may not recover the same conductivity model for the same set of inversion parameters. In this paper, we aim to characterize the fundamental similarities and differences between AirMT inversion for data collected using a magnetic field base station, and for data collected using an electric field base station. We adopt an unconstrained, smoothest model inversion approach to characterize the structures that are naturally recovered by inverting AirMT data when the base station is far away and located on the surface of a homogeneous quarter-space. Our work shows that when a-priori knowledge of the host conductivity within the survey region is available, AirMT inversion effectively recovers conductive and resistive structures within the survey region, regardless of whether the data are collected using an electric or magnetic base station. We show that a single ground magnetotelluric station might provide enough information about the host conductivity to construct a suitable starting model for AirMT inversion, and we discuss the impact of jointly inverting AirMT data and ground magnetotelluric data for a single station.

A Multi-Frame Hybrid Integration Method combined with differential evolution for Maneuvering Target Detection with GNSS-Based Passive Radar

Publication date: Available online 17 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Zhenyu He, Yang Yang, Wu Chen, Ning Cao, Yajuan Guo

Time lag analysis of the space weather effects on muon and neutron flux at different geomagnetic cutoff rigidities

Publication date: Available online 16 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Arfa Mubashir, Ashwin Ashok, Megan Connors, Xiaochun He, H.A. Tharindu G. Hettiarachchi, Petrus Martens, Enosh H. Mudiyanselage, Unil A.G. Perera, Ernesto Potdevin, Viacheslav M. Sadykov, Murad Sarsour, Mihailo Savić, Nikola Veselinović

Deployment of tethered three-body system in elliptic orbit under low-thrust

Publication date: Available online 16 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Cheng Jia, Zhongjie Meng, Xincheng Guo

Advanced Neural Network Approaches for Optimal Check Dam Site Selection in Sub-Tropical Climates

Publication date: Available online 16 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Rabin Chakrabortty, Malay Pramanik, Tarig Ali, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam, Chaitanya B. Pande, Romulus Costache, Mohamed Abioui

Investigation of the global Ionospheric response to 2015 geomagnetic storms using SAMI3 simulations and SWARM satellite data

Publication date: Available online 16 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Masoumeh Mohammadi, Alireza Mahmoudian

Toward GNSS Real-Time Relative Orbit Determination for Satellite Formations Using Adaptively Robust Factor Graph Optimization

Publication date: Available online 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): Cong Hou, Xiaojun Jin, Tong Xiao, Zhaobin Xu, Zhonghe Jin

Capabilities of the GAMMA-400 gamma-ray telescope to study the relationship between high-energy particle precipitation from the Earth’s inner radiation belt and electromagnetic radiation of gamma-ray bursts

Publication date: Available online 15 April 2025

Source: Advances in Space Research

Author(s): A.G. Mayorov, A.A. Leonov, S.Yu. Aleksandrin, V.V. Alexeev, I.V. Arkhangelskaja, A.I. Arkhangelskiy, A.V. Bakaldin, I.V. Chernysheva, O.D. Dalkarov, M.D. Kheymits, M.G. Korotkov, A.V. Kuznetsov, V.V. Malakhov, A.G. Malinin, P.Yu. Minaev, D.N. Morozova, N.Yu. Pappe, M.V. Razumeyko, S.A. Siruk, Yu.I. Stozhkov

An Air Parcel’s Journey Through the Stratosphere

EOS - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 17:57
Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

The stratosphere, one of the Earth’s atmospheric layers, is essential to understand due to its significant influence on the global climate system. Given that the composition of the stratosphere is highly influenced by air transport and circulation, scientists have developed a measure called “age of air” to quantify how long air has been in transport.

A new article in Reviews of Geophysics explores the development and use of this stratospheric age of air metric. Here, we asked the lead author to give an overview of the stratosphere, how scientists use the age of air metric, and what questions remain.

In simple terms, what is the stratosphere and what makes it a particularly interesting layer of the atmosphere to study?

The stratosphere is the second layer of the atmosphere from the ground, at about 20 to 50 kilometers high. Below, in the troposphere, temperatures decrease with height, but in the stratosphere, it gets warmer when moving higher up. This is mostly because of the stratospheric ozone layer, which absorbs high-energy sunlight that warms the stratosphere, and, at the same time, protects us from harmful UV radiation.

The dynamics of the stratosphere are very interesting: the stable stratification (i.e., temperature increase with height) inhibits the formation of “weather”, as we know, it in the troposphere. Nevertheless, the stratosphere is not boring. Certain atmospheric waves formed in the troposphere can propagate upward, and drive a gigantic heat pump in the stratosphere, transporting air upward in the tropics, poleward, and downward over the poles. The existence of such a circulation was first postulated in the 1940s and 1950s and has been named after its proposers the “Brewer-Dobson circulation”.

How does the “Brewer-Dobson circulation” help us to understand the composition of the stratosphere?

Hemisphere-wide transport circulation is important to understand how trace gases are distributed in the stratosphere.

The hemisphere-wide transport circulation is important to understand how trace gases are distributed in the stratosphere. For example, ozone is formed by photochemistry, thus primarily in the tropics, where most sunlight is available. However, ozone concentrations maximize at mid- to high latitudes, and this is thanks to transport by the Brewer-Dobson circulation. Indeed, when Brewer and Dobson took observations of ozone and water vapor in the stratosphere, the only way they could explain them was by a large-scale poleward circulation. However, at this time it was not clear how this circulation could be driven physically, and it took the science community another few decades to understand the dynamical driving of the circulation.

What is the “age of air” and how can it be observed and measured?

One of the problems with the Brewer-Dobson circulation is that it is difficult to observe it directly, since the mean velocities associated with the slow upward motion in the tropics are on the order of millimeters/second. Furthermore, processes other than the slow overturning circulation are important for understanding total transport of air masses, like fast mixing of air between tropics and extra tropics.

One way to quantify this total transport circulation is by average transport times, i.e., measuring how long it takes air to move from its entry into the stratosphere in the tropics to another point in the stratosphere. This transport time is commonly known as “age of stratospheric air”.

One advantage of age of air is that it can be deduced from certain observable trace gases. Specifically, if the concentration of a trace gas rises steadily in the troposphere, one can measure the delay of concentrations in the troposphere versus in the stratosphere. This delay equals the age of air, but strictly only if the trace gas has ideal properties of a linear increase in concentration and no chemical sinks or sources. In the real world, we have some tracers that almost fulfill those conditions, but not exactly, one example being carbon dioxide. Correcting for the non-ideal properties of tracers when deriving age of air from observations is possible, but it is a bit of an art, as we summarize in our new review paper.

How has data on the age of air advanced understanding of processes in the stratosphere?

Many trace gas measurements have been collected via aircraft, balloon, or satellite observations, and we can use them to deduce age of stratospheric air.

Over the last few decades, many trace gas measurements have been collected via aircraft, balloon or satellite observations, and we can use them to deduce age of stratospheric air. This puts us in a situation that we now have a good observational data base on how “old” the air is in the stratosphere on average. As described above, age of air is a measure of the total transport strength in the stratosphere, including many different processes. This is both good and bad: on the one hand, age of air is very well suited to test if global climate models do a good job in simulating transport. On the other hand, solely based on age of air, it is difficult to say which process is how important for the total transport time. Coming up with additional diagnostics of how we can better disentangle the role of different processes for total transport, i.e., for age of air, has been a focus of research in recent years, with good progress.

How is age theory being applied beyond the stratosphere?

The concept of age of air as a measure of transport times from a defined surface to a certain point in a fluid can be used for many geophysical circulations systems. For example, it is commonly used by oceanographers to measure when a water parcel was last in contact with the surface – in this case, the age is considerably longer, on the order of centuries or even millennia, compared to a few years for air in the stratosphere.

Why is understanding stratospheric circulation important for projecting the impacts of climate change?

Changes in the concentration of trace gases in the troposphere under climate change, such as carbon dioxide, methane or nitrous oxides, will be communicated to the stratosphere via the transport circulation. There, those trace gases can have effects on stratospheric temperature via radiation, but also on chemistry, leading to changes in the stratospheric ozone layer or stratospheric water vapor.

Stratospheric circulation and its changes are important in order to understand how the stratospheric ozone layer will be influenced by climate change.

Moreover, there is a long-standing consensus between climate models that the stratospheric Brewer-Dobson circulation will speed up in response to climate change, with consequences for how fast trace gases are transported into and through the stratosphere. Thus, stratospheric circulation and its changes are important in order to understand how the stratospheric ozone layer will be influenced by climate change, directly impacting our UV shield. Moreover, changes in the concentrations of ozone and water vapor, particularly in the lower stratosphere, lead to changes in the overall radiation, directly impacting climate change on the surface.

What are some of the remaining questions where additional modeling, data or research efforts are needed?

A topic of much debate over the last decades is whether the acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson circulation simulated by climate models can be detected in observations. The problem here is that the trends are on the order of a few percent per decade, so we need very high precision data for many decades to detect a trend. Given many uncertainties in deducing age of air from trace gas measurements, at the moment we must conclude that our database is not good enough to derive long-term trends in age of air, at least in the middle stratosphere. Thus, continuous collection of high-quality data of stratospheric trace gases will be necessary to make progress on detecting long-term changes in the stratospheric circulation.

—Hella Garny (hella.garny@dlr.de; 0000-0003-4960-2304), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany

Citation: Garny, H. (2025), An air parcel’s journey through the stratosphere, Eos, 106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EO255014. Published on 25 April 2025. This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s). Text © 2025. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

El conocimiento fluye de ida y vuelta en el TierraFest 2025

EOS - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 16:30

This is an authorized translation of an Eos article. Esta es una traducción al español autorizada de un artículo de Eos.

Después de 5 años de organizar el TierraFest, un evento anual que celebra las ciencias de la Tierra en México, una de las cosas que Raiza Piltowsky Gruner ha aprendido es que cuando se trata de comunicar el conocimiento sobre nuestro ambiente, “nosotros los científicos no somos las personas con la mayor autoridad. Todos vivimos en este planeta”.

“Hay muchas otras formas de generar conocimiento, para validarlo y vivirlo”.

Ella explicó esto durante la conferencia de prensa del evento, donde además anunció el tema del festival para este año: “Juntxs contra la tormenta”. Los organizadores del TierraFest no querían transmitir la idea de que los científicos eran la única fuente de soluciones a problemas como el cambio climático, dijo Pilatowsky Gruner. Este ha sido uno de los valores bases de Planeteando, la asociación sin fines de lucro detrás del TierraFest.

Aunque el método científico es válido e importante, “hay muchas otras formas de generar conocimiento, para validarlo y vivirlo”, añadió Pilatowsky Guner. Ella cree que esta filosofía ha hecho del TierraFest un espacio seguro para la diversidad en un escenario político incierto.

Esta semana, Ciudad de México será sede de una feria de ciencia, performances en vivo y películas para gente de todas las edades para reflexionar sobre la relación que tenemos con el planeta.

Aprendizaje horizontal

Un ejemplo de diversidad en el festival de este año es el evento de apertura, dijo Carla Chávez, quien empezó en Planeteando como una estudiante de servicio social y es ahora una colaboradora regular. El 22 de abril (Día de la Tierra), el TierraFest empieza con una caminata al Parque Nacional de Los Dinamos, un bosque por donde pasa el Río Magdalena, el último río que corre libre en la capital de México.

“Creemos en el aprendizaje horizontal. Aprendemos de ellos y ellos aprenden de nosotros”.

Chávez, una bióloga de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), explicó que en Planeteando no quieren ser intrusos en la comunidad histórica de la Magdalena Atlitic, donde se llevará a cabo la caminata. “Creemos en el aprendizaje horizontal”, dijo. “Aprendemos de ellos y ellos aprenden de nosotros”.

Durante la caminata, Marisol Tovar Valentínez y su equipo de monitores comunitarios, miembros de la comunidad que hacen voluntariado para proteger sus bosques, guiarán a los participantes en su bosque, acompañados por los organizadores del TierraFest y la National Geographic Explorer Daniela Cafaggi.

Como parte del aprendizaje horizontal, los monitores comunitarios en entrenamiento se unirán a la caminata para aprender del equipo del TierraFest y practicar sus habilidades para guiar grupos. Además también compartirán su conocimiento sobre el bosque con los asistentes.

A diferencia de Pilatowsky Gruner, Tovar Valentínez dijo que piensa que, de hecho, los científicos podrían tener una voz de autoridad sobre el conocimiento del planeta. “Pero no sobre la sabiduría”, apuntó, describiendo la sabiduría como el conocimiento creado y protegido como comunidades como la suya. La sabiduría es un proceso continuo y vivo, dijo, aunque está en peligro de perderse a medida que mueren los ancianos de la comunidad.

Tovar Valentínez dijo que valora trabajar con científicos, incluyendo Cafaggi, una bióloga de la UNAM que trabaja con la comunidad Atlitic para estudiar los murciélagos en sus bosques.

Uniendo perspectivas distintas

El 24 de abril, el TierraFest continuará con el ConCervezatorio, evento en el que científicos y activistas comparten sus opiniones y perspectivas con unos tragos.

Pilatowsky Gruner explicó en la conferencia de prensa que los organizadores quieren usar el TierraFest 2025 para resaltar la importancia de unir gente de diferentes contextos, “Juntxs contra la tormenta”. Esa unidad puede ayudar a los individuos y comunidades a enfrentar el cambio climático y las tendencias globales como el extractivismo, ambas “tormentas” afectando el mundo entero.

Después de los tragos, la celebración de distintas perspectivas sobre los retos de la Tierra continúa. Chávez se meterá en la piel de Carmilla Desmondus, una drag queen inspirada en la icónica vampira lesbiana del libro Carmilla, de autor irlandes Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu y Desmondus, el género de los “murciélagos vampiros” chupa sangre.

“Dragas por la Tierra” surgió como un evento anual en el TierraFest tres años atrás, cuando se invitó a participar a la drag queen Bia Hollis. Pedro Adad Tristán Flores, biólogo detrás de Bia Hollis, fue también un estudiante de servicio social de Planeteando antes de ser un colaborador recurrente. Desde entonces, cada año su colectivo de drag queens toma inspiración de los temas del TierraFest para diseñar sus vestuarios y su maquillaje, los que ellas explican durante el show.

Este año, las actividades LGBTQ+ del TierraFest se expandirán para incluir el performance de teatro playback del colectivo Xuir, en el cual la audiencia contará sus historias personales mientras que los actores las interpretan en vivo. Los organizadores propondrán historias sobre la intersección entre el trabajo científico y las identidades LGBTQ+.

Mostrándole el mundo a los asistentes

El 26 de abril, el TierraFilme presentará otra de sus ediciones de películas sobre el planeta Tierra. Por primera vez, este evento se realizará en el Papalote Museo del Niño, un espacio dedicado a la comunicación de la ciencia para niños, y empezará con la proyección de uno de los episodios de la serie documental de National Geographic A Real Bug’s Life. Los asistentes verán cortometrajes de México y de Latinoamérica sobre temas como el efecto de la basura, la pérdida de lenguas indígenas y los impactos de la expansión urbana.

Los eventos del TierraFest terminarán el 27 de abril, cuando El Centro Cultural El Rule, la casa del festival ya por un tiempo, recibirá una vez más la Feria de Ciencia TierraFest. Activistas y científicos mostrarán su trabajo a adultos y niños en más de 20 talleres sobre el agua, el aire, la Tierra y la vida. Desde la vida en los mares paleozoicos hasta problemas contemporáneos como el impacto que las tuberías de gas subacuáticas podría tener en las ballenas, estos científicos están enfocados en entender mejor el planeta y compartir el conocimiento con todos.

Roberto González (@ggonzalitos), Escritor de ciencia

This translation by Anthony Ramírez-Salazar (@Anthnyy) was made possible by a partnership with Planeteando y GeoLatinas. Esta traducción fue posible gracias a una asociación con Planeteando and GeoLatinas.

Text © 2025. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

'Cryosphere meltdown' will impact Arctic marine carbon cycles and ecosystems, new study warns

Phys.org: Earth science - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 15:58
A new study led by Jochen Knies from the iC3 Polar Research Hub has found worrying signs that climate change may be undermining the capacity of Arctic fjords to serve as effective carbon sinks. The findings suggest that the capacity of polar oceans to remove carbon from the atmosphere may be reduced as the world continues to heat up.

Trump Moves to Allow Seabed Mining in International Waters

EOS - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 14:11
body {background-color: #D2D1D5;} Research & Developments is a blog for brief updates that provide context for the flurry of news regarding law and policy changes that impact science and scientists today.

A new executive order, issued on 24 April, aims to help private companies to mine the deep sea.

Some areas of the ocean floor host swaths of potato-sized nodules that contain coveted minerals such as cobalt and nickel. For the past decade, the International Seabed Authority (ISA) has been developing a mining code, which would govern the laws of how nations explore and exploit these resources.

But in the new executive order citing the 1980 Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act, President Trump declared that the United States—the only major global economy that is not part of the ISA—would create a process for granting companies permits to mine these minerals.

Under the Law of 1994 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Treaty (which the United States did not ratify), a nation has economic rights to the resources within 200 nautical miles of its coast, but international waters fall under ISA jurisdiction.

The new order aims to establish the United States “as a global leader in seabed mineral exploration and development both within and beyond national jurisdiction,” according to text released by the White House.

 
Related

Dozens of nations have called for a moratorium, pause, or ban on deep-sea mining, and companies including BMW, Google, and Samsung have vowed to not use deep-sea minerals in their products until the risks of doing so are better understood. When The Metals Company, a Canadian seabed mining company, announced in March that it planned to apply for exploration and extraction permits through the U.S. government, even nations that generally support mining in international waters, such as China and Russia, condemned the company’s actions.

At the ISA Council’s session last month, Leticia Carvalho, secretary general of the ISA, expressed “deep concern” over The Metals Company’s announcement, saying that any unilateral action not taken under the ISA’s authority “would constitute a violation of international law.”

As Eos has reported, much of the concern surrounding deep sea mining comes from how little is known about ecosystems on the ocean floor, meaning mining these modules could have significant unforeseen impacts.

“There are still major gaps in understanding biodiversity and ecosystem functions at polymetallic nodule ecosystems,” Sabine Gollner, a deep-sea marine biologist at the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research told Eos last year. “Once nodules are removed by mining, all biodiversity and functions directly dependent on the minerals will be lost for millions of years at the mined location.”

—Emily Dieckman (@emfurd.bsky.social), Associate Editor

These updates are made possible through information from the scientific community. Do you have a story about how changes in law or policy are affecting scientists or research? Send us a tip at eos@agu.org. Text © 2025. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Fiber-sensing technology can provide early warning for volcanic eruptions

Phys.org: Earth science - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 13:14
The Reykjanes Peninsula at Iceland's southwestern edge is one of the country's most populated regions, and it is also one of the most volcanically active. In 2024, sensing technology developed at Caltech was deployed in the region to study the motion of subsurface magma and its eruption into lava on the surface.

A New View of Gamma Rays from Thunderclouds

EOS - Fri, 04/25/2025 - 12:21

Neutron stars, supernova explosions, and other extremely energetic phenomena across the universe produce gamma rays, the highest-energy radiation in the electromagnetic spectrum. Closer to home, the Sun also emits gamma rays, and here on Earth, gamma ray sources include nuclear explosions, radioactive decay of certain materials (sometimes applied for medical uses), and—as we’ve known for about 30 years—lightning.

Many details of lightning-generated gamma rays, however, including how common they are, have remained uncertain over the past few decades since they were discovered. Every day, more than 3 million lightning strikes occur in thunderstorms around the planet. How many of these lightning bolts emit gamma radiation?

Such information is important for improving our understanding of the chemistry and dynamics of thunderclouds and other features, which feeds into our ability to forecast weather, including potentially hazardous conditions, more accurately.

With recent observations and research, scientists are revealing new insights into the mysteries of Earth’s atmospheric gamma rays, including that thunderclouds act as huge particle accelerators, emitting gamma rays far more often than previously thought.

Early Observations of Terrestrial Gamma Rays

The scientists involved were clearly amazed to find that such a gamma ray source existed in their own backyard.

In the early 1990s, the first observations of gamma rays in thunderstorms revealed a phenomenon known as terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs). The discovery, made by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO), a space observatory built to study gamma rays originating in space, came as a big surprise for the scientific community. The scientists involved were clearly amazed to find that such a gamma ray source existed in their own backyard, writing that “detectors aboard the CGRO have observed an unexplained terrestrial phenomenon: brief, intense flashes of gamma rays” [Fishman et al., 1994].

The find immediately set the stage for the next 3 decades of research in the field of atmospheric electricity, with researchers intensely scrutinizing terrestrial gamma rays. However, in retrospect, it is evident that for much of this time, exploration and measurements of gamma rays were hampered by the available instrumentation. The only workable detectors for gamma ray detection at the time had been developed to study processes other than TGFs. These detectors included the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) on CGRO and the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) and, more recently, the Astro Rivelatore Gamma a Immagini Leggero and the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor.

BATSE, for example, was designed to study gamma ray bursts from the universe, but because it had difficulty capturing very short (~1 millisecond) TGFs, the BATSE measurements were heavily biased toward the most intense events. Meanwhile, RHESSI measurements sometimes combined detections of TGF photons from two events into one [Grefenstette et al., 2008].

A Purpose-Built Mission

A few years before the discovery of TGFs, in 1989, the first documented cases of unexpected lightning above thunderclouds were observed. Several phenomena, collectively referred to as transient luminous events (TLEs), were characterized and given mythical names like blue jets, elves, and red sprites.

Early this century, researchers began developing a plan to study these newly identified atmospheric events from the International Space Station (ISS). With scientists at the University of Valencia in Spain and the University of Bergen (UiB) in Norway, Torsten Neubert from the Technical University of Denmark initiated the Atmosphere-Space Interactions Monitor (ASIM) project. While Neubert and his team took the lead on TLE studies, Nikolai Østgaard and his group at UiB developed an instrument specifically designed for TGF studies called the Modular X- and Gamma-ray Sensor (MXGS) as part of ASIM.

The finding that terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) happen before the visible flashes of lightning was crucial for establishing a theoretical framework for the sequence of events in thunderstorms.

In 2018, the ASIM payload was finally launched into space and mounted on the ISS’s Columbus module. From this vantage, more than 400 kilometers above the ground, ASIM would have a view from above of the drama unfolding during thunderstorms. Over the next few years, the scientists reported several groundbreaking observations.

For example, Østgaard et al. [2019] found that TGFs observed from space actually occur before or simultaneously with the optical (visible light) pulses of lightning. Østgaard et al. [2021] then found that the delay of the optical pulse in those cases was explained well by the scattering of light through clouds. This finding, that TGFs happen before the visible flashes of lightning, was crucial for establishing a theoretical framework for the sequence of events in thunderstorms. It means that electrons are accelerated to relativistic energies in electric fields associated with long conductive leaders and that the optical pulse we see from space is a signature of the leader discharge that follows.

In another study, Neubert et al. [2019] reported the first simultaneous observation of TGFs and TLEs known as elves (emissions of light and very low frequency perturbations), confirming previous theoretical predictions of their co-occurrence.

ALOFT Changes the Game

ASIM observations provided great insights into TGFs, but the question remained whether a significant population of TGFs that are too weak to observe from space existed. That question, addressed and discussed by Østgaard et al. [2012], motivated the Airborne Lightning Observatory for FEGS and TGFs (ALOFT) flight campaign, a collaboration between UiB and NASA, in summer 2023.

The ER-2 aircraft is seen from below during an ALOFT campaign flight on 12 July 2023. Credit: NASA/Carla Thomas

Building on their experience developing MXGS, the UiB scientists came up with a new instrument, called UiB-BGO, to measure gamma rays from NASA’s ER-2 aircraft. Although the detector and front-end electronics were similar to those in MXGS, the system used on ASIM to trigger gamma ray measurements was replaced with a data acquisition and storage system that enabled continuous data recording during flights.

The results from the Airborne Lightning Observatory for FEGS and TGFs flight campaign have turned out to be game-changing.

Ten ALOFT flights were conducted, with NASA operating the ER-2 out of MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. The aircraft visited tropical thunderstorms around the Gulf of Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean, flying just above the thunderclouds at heights of about 20 kilometers and bringing the UiB-BGO as close as possible to the spectacular events unfolding.

Real-time telemetry of gamma ray count rates allowed scientists to recognize immediately whether the plane was flying over a gamma ray–producing storm. They could then instruct the pilot to turn and scan an area again to maximize gamma ray detections. The ER-2’s instrument payload also included lightning sensors and microwave sensors, which provided data on thundercloud characteristics.

The results from ALOFT have turned out to be game-changing. Prior to the flight campaign, terrestrial gamma rays were considered rare, and only two types—microsecond bursts of TGFs and gamma ray glows that lasted minutes at a time—had been observed. That prior understanding has now been updated significantly.

Flickering Flashes and Boiling Glows

Observations of ample gamma ray events from the ALOFT campaign suggest that TGFs occur up to 100 times more frequently than previously believed [Østgaard et al., 2024; Marisaldi et al., 2024; Bjørge-Engeland et al., 2024]. It turns out that a substantial population of TGFs is, indeed, too weak to observe from space, showing that earlier detection efforts from space had just scratched the tip of the iceberg. Further, unlike previous flight campaigns that circulated around the outskirts of thunderclouds, the ALOFT ER-2 flew directly above thunderclouds, enabling it to detect the weak TGF population.

Data from ALOFT also allowed identification of a third, previously undetected terrestrial gamma ray phenomenon named flickering gamma ray flashes (FGFs), which seem to combine characteristics of both TGFs and gamma ray glows [Østgaard et al., 2024]. FGFs begin as glows before intensifying into pulsed sequences of gamma ray emissions resembling TGFs, except that the pulses last longer (~2 milliseconds) and the sequences overall last tens to hundreds of milliseconds. As with gamma glows, but unlike TGFs, initiation of FGFs is not associated with detectable optical or radio signals, including lightning discharges.

The old picture of minutes-long gamma ray glows must be revisited too. The recent observations show that thunderclouds can actually emit gamma rays for hours and that these emissions can take place over many thousands of square kilometers. They also seem to be highly dynamic in space and time, with gamma glows popping up for 1–10 seconds at a time in different locations within the most highly convective cores of a cloud system, resembling bubbles in a boiling pot [Marisaldi et al., 2024].

Reconsidering the Role of Atmospheric Gamma Rays

Thunderclouds are, indeed, huge particle accelerators, and gamma ray emissions, hardly a rarity, are an intrinsic part of highly convective systems.

The groundbreaking results from the ALOFT campaign suggest a revised view of the role of gamma rays in the atmosphere and that we need to reconsider existing frameworks describing gamma ray phenomena. Thunderclouds are, indeed, huge particle accelerators, and gamma ray emissions, hardly a rarity, are an intrinsic part of highly convective systems.

Assessing the implications of this new knowledge will motivate additional questions and continued study of atmospheric electricity. It’s possible, for example, that gamma ray generation contributes importantly to lightning initiation, at least for a large fraction of lightning.

Considering that about 2,000 thunderstorms are active on the planet at any given moment and about 3 million lightning strikes occur each day globally, further discerning the effects of gamma ray production and propagation on thundercloud dynamics is a fundamental need for improving our understanding of and ability to forecast the planet’s weather and atmospheric environment.

References

Bjørge-Engeland, I., et al. (2024), Evidence of a new population of weak terrestrial gamma-ray flashes observed from aircraft altitude, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51(17), e2024GL110395, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110395.

Fishman, G. J., et al. (1994), Discovery of intense gamma-ray flashes of atmospheric origin, Science, 264, 1,313–1,316, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5163.1313.

Grefenstette, B. W., et al. (2008), Time evolution of terrestrial gamma ray flashes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(6), L06802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032922.

Marisaldi, M., et al. (2024), Highly dynamic gamma-ray emissions are common in tropical thunderclouds, Nature, 634, 57–60, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07936-6.

Neubert, T., et al. (2019), A terrestrial gamma-ray flash and ionospheric ultraviolet emissions powered by lightning, Science, 367, 183–186, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3872.

Østgaard, N., et al. (2012), The true fluence distribution of terrestrial gamma flashes at satellite altitude, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 117, A03327, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017365.

Østgaard, N., et al. (2019), First 10 months of TGF observations by ASIM, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124(24), 14,024–14,036, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031214.

Østgaard, N., et al. (2021), Simultaneous observations of EIP, TGF, Elve, and optical lightning, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 126(11), e2020JD033921, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033921.

Østgaard, N., et al. (2024), Flickering gamma-ray flashes, the missing link between gamma glows and TGFs, Nature, 634, 53–56, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07893-0.

Author Information

Arve Aksnes (Arve.Aksnes@vlfk.no), Nikolai Østgaard, Martino Marisaldi, and Ingrid Bjørge-Engeland, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Citation: Aksnes, A., N. Østgaard, M. Marisaldi, and I. Bjørge-Engeland (2025), A new view of gamma rays from thunderclouds, Eos, 106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EO250156. Published on 25 April 2025. Text © 2025. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer